Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tornado damage (2)

Tornado damage
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2013  at 20:02:27 (UTC)
 * Reason:High quality photograph, good resolution, and very high EV. One of the best, if not the best, images of tornado damage on Wikipedia. Meets criteria 4 and 6 since it was created by FEMA. Was rejected last time with a request for a crop and to wait and see if the image stuck in the articles.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Tornado intensity and damage, May 10–13, 2010 tornado outbreak
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather
 * Creator:Win Henderson/FEMA


 * Support as nominator -- Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 20:02, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, prefer uncropped. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, prefer uncropped - Good resolution, good quality. Uncropped version allows us to see that it's not just this house which was destroyed (note the additional debris in the background) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, prefer uncropped I agree with crisco on how it picturize the destruction of tornado. Godhulii 1985 (talk) 08:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Alt (uncropped) per above. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 19:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, Prefer Original - I actually prefer the original here. I completely understand the addition of the uncropped version, however aesthetically I just prefer the original without the bold colours on the right hand side of the image being a distraction. JFitch   (talk)  00:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 04:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)