Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tower of Silence

Tower of Silence


This picture is quite lovely and evocative, and is the jewel in the crown of the Towers of Silence article. - Smerdis of Tlön 16:17, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC) 
 * Nominate and Support. - Smerdis of Tlön 16:17, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Bleak and beautiful -- I support. Jwrosenzweig 20:44, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Neutral I can't tell what resolution that picture is at....The full size version is very pixelated. Could someone upload a good loking version. [[User:BrokenSegue|BrokenSegue]] 22:19, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Object until a proper copyright tag is added. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality/talk]] 03:36, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Agree with BrokenSegue. Incredibly pixelated.--Fir0002 04:25, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * It is not. Reload the page. Fredrik | talk 06:11, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. imho, this picture isn't very interesting, and I can't see how it would add significantly to an article about geography/geology/rocks etc. Enochlau 15:05, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose, focus is not sharp, and the utility lines distract from the subject. - Bevo 15:08, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Flat, poor quality. ed g2s  &bull;  talk  16:49, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Can't be promoted without an appropriate copyright tag ed g2s  &bull;  talk  16:49, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I have asked Maziart to clarify its status. I see that another request was made on his talk page in November.  Not sure how often he logs in.  -- Smerdis of Tlön 01:44, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Going by his contributions, not since he posted that image. ed g2s  &bull;  talk  04:27, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose until copyright is clarified, support with suitable copyright -- Chris 73 Talk 23:47, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Even with copyright clarification, what makes you want to support it? Enochlau 15:14, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Quality issues.--ZayZayEM 00:43, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Not promoted, +2 / -7