Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tree frog Congo

Tree frog Congo
Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2014  at 18:26:53 (UTC)
 * Reason: Image is 2,400× 3,200 pixels. It is a high quality image and I didn't found any issue.
 * Articles in which this image appears: Amphibian and Common reed frog
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians
 * Creator: Nick Hobgood


 * Support as nominator –  Jim Car ter  18:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Unsharp (camera jitter) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Support - It looks clear to me. Crisco, where does it look unsharp to you? In the leaves, or in the frog? Some of the leaves look a little unclear, but the frog looks clear to me. Do they both have to be sharp? CorinneSD (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * At full resolution, the camera jitter is quite clear (see, for instance, at the head and back; the crackleature [for lack of a better word] of the frog's back is fuzzy). Tough to shoot at 1/50; if Nick had gone up to ISO 200, he'd have gotten 1/80 or 1/100 and probably a sharper shot. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose Camera shake --Muhammad (talk) 03:41, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose That Camera Is Too Shaky. National Names 2000 (talk) 05:12, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I see what you mean now, Crisco. It's especially noticeable on the head of the frog. CorinneSD (talk) 16:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 18:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)