Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Triangulum.nebula.arp.750pix

Triangulum.nebula.arp.750pix
This is just an all-around cool picture. It's a nebula taken by Hubble. Uploaded by Arpingstone, it is used on Nebula, Stellar evolution, H II region, Nebula NGC 604, and it's even on the Template:Space-stub. - Dmcdevit 22:48, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC) +6 / -4 Its a bit borderline, but even several of the support votes seem to prefer an alternative image. -- Solipsist 19:55, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) 
 * Nominate and support. -- Dmcdevit 22:48, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I'll support it too, despite the fact that space-stub is being considered for deletion by WP:WSS (it duplicates astronomy-stub and rocket-stub). Grutness|hello? [[Image:Grutness.jpg|25px|]] 23:45, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * support lovely picture. Plugwash 00:54, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support, but I have to point out Space astub was redundant with and now redirects to it Circeus 01:27, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * So I see. On a related note, has anyone checked out Image:Pleiades large.jpg (which is on ); any picture that is on, by my count, 57 genuine articles must have something going for it. --Dmcdevit 01:31, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Before I vote-This image was taken with the old WIFPC2 CCD imager on Hubble while a newer version taken in '03 with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) is larger and cleaner. It can be seen here what do you think about replacing the image with that one? The colors are different but they're false color anyway....--Deglr6328 06:54, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * commnet the version we have here has an eiree feel that the other one doesn't seem to share because of the choice of colors. I like that feeling but i can see how the other one is almost certainly a techincally higher quality image. Also the newer version seems to be missing a large section of background Plugwash.
 * Support this version. The newer version is even nicer, except for the lower right, which ruins it. :( &mdash;Korath (Talk) 11:06, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The choice of false colours here is horrible. Enochlau 14:06, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Astrowob
 * Oppose. I dislike the false colors and there appears to be a lot of noise (although those may be stars) --Fir0002 07:42, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Jonas Olson 20:23, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Not all that aesthetically appealing (to me), there's some technical weirdness in the top left corner (probably a mosaicing artifact). But (I know this is late in the game) it's probably worth featuring/not featuring the higher-resolution version from the original site.  For what it's worth, I much prefer the newer version linked above (missing corner and all). --Andrew 08:16, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)