Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tutufa bufo shell

Tutufa bufo
Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2011 at 09:19:25 (UTC)
 * Reason:Featured on Commons, high quality, good EV, used in other national Wiki.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Tutufa bufo, Tutufa
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Animals/Others
 * Creator:George Chernilevsky


 * Support as nominator -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. High quality, encyclopedic. Nautica Shad es  17:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd add that I think the lighting issues are minimal here, and don't overly detract from the EV. Nautica Shad es  11:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Size reference, or scale, or description of the size on the image page would be helpful. Spikebrennan (talk) 20:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, added (101 mm) -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:43, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Oppose uneven lighting in comparison of both samples. Jó Kritika (talk) 01:56, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose A bit hasty with the photoshopping? The lefthand shell is horrifically cut out. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 21:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose The lighting leaves quite a bit to be desired. JJ Harrison (talk) 06:47, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy close??? Aaadddaaammm (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy closes cause too much controversy. They only happen when the uploader requests a withdrawal. J Milburn (talk) 02:28, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, you should only invoke speedy close if there is absolutely no question that everyone is going to oppose. However, Nautica above clearly supports it; so speedy close is especially inapposite. Purpy Pupple (talk) 02:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, i agree with speedy close and withdraw this nomination. Thanks to all for review -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 20:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator. Makeemlighter (talk) 20:25, 14 January 2011 (UTC)