Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/US halfstaff sunset

US halfstaff sunset

 * Reason:This picture looks nice with the sunset at the back, and has certainly got a strong emotional impact due to what it´s meaning is.
 * Articles this image appears in:Half-staff
 * Creator:fr:User:A3 nm


 * Support as nominator &mdash; ♠  Tom   @  s   Bat   22:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose, awful quality, pointless.--Svetovid 23:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Please comment with a civil tone. This clearly has a point and might very well illustrate hald-staff. Debivort 00:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

MER-C 08:44, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Far too dark. Witty Lama 23:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Way too dark. And a flag flying at half-staff isn't all that unique. Sorry.  Jumping cheese   Cont @ct 00:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * oppose per above. Debivort 00:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose This is quite atmospheric and evocative, although the picture quality could be improved. But ideally a picture explaining "half-staff" should put it in context, e.g. a funeral procession. This one does not adequately explain the symbolism. With a little bit of Photshopping this might succeed on Commons. ~ trialsanderrors 01:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose. Way too dark. —dima/talk/ 15:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Too dark. 8thstar 18:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose, sigh. Strong emotions created is certainly not the only thing required to take a picture "to tha next level". -- Phoenix  (talk) 18:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. It's pretty, but far too dark. Amphy 16:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)