Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/United States Declaration of Independence

US Declaration of Independence


This is a high-resolution enhanced image of the United States Declaration of Independence. This image is a version of the 1820s William Stone facimile. This image is from the commons, and can be found in the articles United States Declaration of Independence and Human Rights. I am nominating the image for its historical importance.


 * Nominate and Support TomStar81 02:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Excellent quality, and adds significantly. &mdash; BRIAN 0918 &bull; 2006-06-17 03:43
 * Support Very nice scan and there really isn't a better encyclopedic image to display this subject matter. Staxringold talkcontribs 04:16, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. No question this is FP-worthy. -- moondigger 04:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Support. --Mad Max 10:07, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support per all above. Anonymous_  _Anonymous  10:36, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Agree with above. Mikeo 10:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, though I find the slight upward tilt of the lines of writing distracting. Any way you could fix this, or is it a flaw that comes with the original document? --NoahElhardt 14:29, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Probably just scanned at an angle, can and should be straightened. Stevage 23:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It doesn't look like it was scanned at an angle. The edges of the paper line up with the edges of the picture. Maybe it's just a tilt from writing it out by hand. &mdash; BRIAN 0918 &bull; 2006-06-18 03:06


 * Support. As reasons above; really excellent. -- GarrettRock 15:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Support Very high quality picture that is also very "encylopedic". --Geoffrey Gibson 04:22, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, readable! --Golbez 05:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support Very powerful, and I'm not even American! --Fir0002 09:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * High Support - Good historical value. --MosheA 16:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Great image, very valuable to the encyclopedia. --Nebular110 17:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, We're creating an encyclopedia, so this is a natural for FP. --Janke | Talk 20:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, historic document, easily readable at high res, and beautiful handwriting a forgotten skill it seems now.-- Dakota ~ 15:26, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Janderk 11:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Ansaul 20:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Excellent quality. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:52, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Excellent quality, and historical significance would cover up any quality issues, even though in this case they do not exist. Tito xd (?!?) 06:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Not that I'm American-centric or anything, but..."Don't tread on me"  Jo  e  I  13:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 04:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)