Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/V-22 Osprey

V-22 Osprey
Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2011 at 13:30:41 (UTC)
 * Reason:Good quality (in line with other FPs of this category) image showing the aircraft in flight. Dramatic backdrop and good propellor blur. We already have a |FP of the Osprey, landed and in the helicopter position. This complements that nicely and has distinct EV.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey, Powered lift,
 * FP category for this image:Vehicles>Air
 * Creator:US Airforce


 * Support as nominator --Cowtowner (talk) 13:30, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Awesome and nice background. Brand meister  t   19:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 20:08, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support This will compliment the other you mentioned in my growing rotation of backgrounds! I love the other one, but in many ways this one is much cooler! Nicely done... gaz hiley .co.uk  22:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 08:31, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Sanko (talk) 09:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose the background is very distracting and in full resultion as sharp as resp. more sharp than the aircraft. The crop at the left and right is too tight. The image is heavily oversharpened and small for a 10 MP camera. --kaʁstn 10:14, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * A question of principle: if taken with a worse quality camera, would you think that the image quality was acceptable? Cowtowner (talk) 22:21, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose for the same reasons as Carschten. Also, the article is about the aircraft; the background should not be competing for our attention. This picture comes nowhere near the standard of the picture of the landed craft. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 21:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support' - I do think that the background is a tiny bit distracting, yet the background seems to compliment it in some ways too. Nice job. -- Another Type of Zombie talk  14:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment There's something strange going on to the left of the propellers. Makeemlighter (talk) 02:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * That's distortion from the heat coming out of the engines. Cowtowner (talk) 02:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That's what I figured. Makeemlighter (talk) 02:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support--Mbz1 (talk) 03:44, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong support fantastic! --Murdockcrc (talk) 19:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

-- Jujutacular  talk 14:07, 2 May 2011 (UTC)