Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Venezuela - Caracas - Parque del Este (58)-Venezuela - Caracas - Parque del Este (72)-4.jpg

Panoramic view in Parque del Este
Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2012 at 12:07:56 (UTC) Note: The article appears on the article of Parque del Este, but that page is rather poor in english, so I added the link to the article in spanish too. It also appears in the article of Caracas but don't think it counts since it was added 2 days ago. If I have to renominate later, no problem.
 * Reason:High quality, very illustrative, nice scenery. Recently featured on Commons.
 * Articles in which this image appears: Parque Generalísimo Francisco de Miranda (Spanish wiki), Caracas, Parque del Este, Roberto Burle Marx.
 * FP category for this image:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Places/Panorama
 * Creator:Paolo Costa


 * Support as nominator -- Paolo Costa  12:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I removed the image from Caracas, as it is over-illustrated already and the image was badly formatted. The best bet for this image is in Parque del Este, which as you say could use some expansion.  Jujutacular  talk 14:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment No problem. Even though I still think the article of Caracas could really use images like this one, since the ones it has don't have good quality. This park is also a very very important landmark of the city, it is huge. -- Paolo Costa  16:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I would say it is a problem when a decent picture gets removed and bunch of crap gets left in there. Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed lots of crap there, but what really matters is if the park is more significant than the other parts of the city illustrated in the article. I don't know Caracas, but I would imagine that is more important than this green space. --Elekhh (talk) 09:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Exactly why the image should not have been removed. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I won't stop it from being put back in but at the very least it needs to be formatted correctly. It was covering text.  Jujutacular  talk 13:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support very good EV for Parque del Este and nice image. Indeed two years ago it was expected that articles are more substantial, but recently I saw many images promoted while illustrating stubs, so it wouldn't be fair to abstain on that ground. --Elekhh (talk) 09:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Added to the article about the landscape architect Roberto Burle Marx, although of limited EV. Also added some good sources to the article. --Elekhh (talk) 09:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you Elekhh -- Paolo Costa  01:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Meets the criteria. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Please fix the magenta white balance tinge. JJ Harrison (talk) 10:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Fixed -- Paolo Costa  04:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support JJ Harrison (talk) 06:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Per above. Impressive picture, has EV, meets criteria, deserves promotion. Dusty777 (talk) 02:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

-- Jujutacular  talk 13:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)