Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Vernal Falls

Vernal Falls from Top

 * Reason:Interesting composition
 * Articles this image appears in:Vernal_Fall
 * Creator:User:Bobmilkman

MER-C 04:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator &mdash; Bobmilkman 05:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * oppose - tilted, no detail in blown water. Debivort 07:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose - blown highlights in water, out of focus, blurry yet over-sharpened giving colour fringing. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * oppose per above. The rapids are a single mass of blown highlight. --Bridgecross 13:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * oppose per above. Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Per above. 8thstar 22:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Very similar to this nomination, but with blown highlights and lots of noise.  Jumping cheese   Cont @ct 05:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Im not very technical when it comes to photo's so i dont know the terminology but i'd say the water is too bright and the picture is quite grainy -- Ch ild zy ( Talk 21:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The rainbow's quite nice, but the water is overexposed. If you have a raw file, you can try to convert it to jpeg using a darker setting, or use other techniques to get some texture in the water. Fg2 11:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)