Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Villageinbihar

Village in India

 * Reason:It is of a good quality and should be nominated as it also has some useful meaning behind it.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Village
 * Creator:Extra999


 * Support as nominator Extra999 (talk) 00:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC) 15:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose Blur, cut-off tree, rope? --Muhammad (talk) 13:34, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Rope does not matter. --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 13:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidentally it does otherwise Muhammad wouldn't have mentioned it... I agree with them as well - it's very distracting... Framing is poor with cut off tree, and there's too much blur - looks more like a watercolour than a photograph... Gazhiley (talk) 14:38, 26 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Suggest Speedy Close as per my above comments and as per Mohammad... Gazhiley (talk) 14:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Where exactly is the village on this picture? --Dschwen 17:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment  --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 03:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I should have seen this coming :-). I wasn't asking where on the world the village is located, but where in the picture it is visible. --Dschwen 03:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * For that houses are on the other side and farms are visible. I know, I still can't understand your language. --Extra999 (Contact me + contribs) 09:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If only the farms are visible, then this does not really illustrate a village at all. Especially not to featured picture standard. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  09:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose, suggest Speedy Close. Per arguments above. &#208;iliff    &#171;&#187;  (Talk)  09:11, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have removed the image from the article village because it is not illustrating a village nor an aspect of village life.  Mae din \talk 18:41, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

--Makeemlighter (talk) 06:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Per WP:SNOW. Makeemlighter (talk) 06:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)