Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Water Babies

Water Babies

 * Reason:Scan of an original illustration by Jessie Willcox Smith for the children's book The Water-Babies. An unrestored version can be found here.
 * Articles this image appears in:Water Babies, Jessie Willcox Smith
 * Creator:Jessie Willcox Smith (Illustrator)


 * Support as nominator ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 03:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Per above discussion, and some followup, the crop is a reasonable choice if no border of blank paper is to be allowed. That said, it worries me that, in order to crop it without a border, part of the art was lost. Even if the borderless version is preferred in Wikipedia articles, the lack of an alternate uncropped version means that anyone using the restoration in future will, by necessity, have to leave a small part of the artwork out. No vote.  Shoemaker&#39;s Holiday (talk) 07:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per above. No issue about the signature. Atlantic Gateways (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose I think this is a beautiful and interesting image. However, picking up from where Shoemaker left off, I'm wondering if there's some tiny rotation or negligible stretch that could be performed on this image to put all of it in the rectangular frame. In my mind, it would hardly affect the rest of the image, but be a lot more professional. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 18:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Most likely not. Stretches usually end up being pretty messy. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * And why is that? Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 14:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * [Off-topic discussion moved to WT:FPC]
 * Comment in the "off-topic discussion" (err, not really...), Shoemaker offered to upload a crop with the picture fully preserved, along with a bit of frame. This might be helpful. Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 14:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'm also uncomfortable supporting this excellent image because of the crop.  Nothing wrong with leaving a border of blank paper when images aren't precisely rectangular.  I hope it's possible to get a wider crop to vote on.--ragesoss (talk) 18:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

MER-C 01:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)