Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Waterspout

Waterspout



 * Nominate and support. - I think that this picture in better quality can be a really great picture. Baseracer 01:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Doesn't meet size requirements per What is a featured picture?, is way too grainy, and has blown highlights. I agree with the nominator, a better picture would get more support, but this version just doesn't cut it. -- Tewy  02:12, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Agree with Tewy, very impressive scene, very underwhelming quality capture. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 13:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Tewy. Also, some people are not into doctored photos. There is a link to the original where you can see dust has been removed (good) and clouds painted in the top right corner (possibly bad). I personally don't care that much about that aspect, but I know some voters distain this sort of thing so I am mentioning it.--Andrew c 16:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose per all above. --Bridgecross 18:59, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose 636 pixels across, 1000 minimum is the requirement - Adrian Pingstone 20:13, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Horrible quality, and much too small. Please read WP:WIAFP. Nautica Shad e  s  21:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose. As per above. - jlao   0  4  02:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

--KFP (talk | contribs) 22:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)