Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Windows of Santa Ana Cathedral

Windows of Santa Ana Cathedral
Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2011 at 20:36:47 (UTC)
 * Reason:High resolution‎, encyclopedia value, Featured, Quality and valuable in commons
 * Articles in which this image appears:Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Religion and mythology
 * Creator:commons:User:Llez


 * Support as nominator -- Ladsgroupبحث 20:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment The image is good, but the current article placement means that it doesn't have much EV as is. JJ Harrison (talk) 10:04, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent composition and adequate resolution, but a bit noisy imho. Brand meister  t   13:45, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Hell yeah! Aaadddaaammm (talk) 14:50, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose -- Wonderful images, highly detailed, very encyclopedic.... however.... I'm not seeing the reason to lump them all together into one huge image. It seems these would be more useful and practical if they were displayed together, yet as separate images. JBarta (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Support ..ticks pretty much every box for me Walkabout12 (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I don't think this image has sufficiently high encyclopaedic value, there are technical issues, and per JBarta, I don't like their display together as one image. --Xijky (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Some pictures speak a 1000 encyclopedic words of their own. Saffron Blaze (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose (edit conflict) I don't want to oppose, but it has not enough EV at the moment; I expected to see this picture in Santa Ana Cathedral. You linked the city Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, but I don't think it is representative; I would think of a picture of a landscape, for example.-- ♫GoP♫ T C N 11:14, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The image can be used at Christianity at Spain, Christianity at Canary Island, Articles about glass painting or glass painting at cathedrals, this image can be separated 5 images and be used separately. Using in irrelevant article is not sign of low EV Ladsgroupبحث 13:54, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It isn't, but the fact that it is not used in any relevant articles certainly is (or would be, no opinion from me at this time)- that is what GOP is arguing. J Milburn (talk) 16:51, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong support as very nice work -- George Chernilevsky  talk 16:35, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose per myself. JJ Harrison (talk) 09:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Conditional Support if the photo can be placed in an appropriate article where it adds EV. Spikebrennan (talk) 16:40, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose due to the limited EV. J Milburn (talk) 21:06, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. Nice picture, but I agree that a link should be added to a more meaningful article.  DCI2026 (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

--Julia\talk 22:56, 27 November 2011 (UTC)