Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Wrentit

Wrentit

 * Reason:Very high resolution, nice illustration
 * Articles this image appears in:Wrentit, Old World babbler
 * Creator:Planephotoman


 * Support as nominator Raul654 (talk) 18:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak support Almost but not quite as sharp as I would like. Some may prefer a tighter crop.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 20:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose Not very sharp, and the subject is a bit small and to the side. TheOtherSiguy (talk) 20:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Very pretty picture, high quality and very encyclopedic. J Milburn (talk) 22:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Support. Not as sharp as I would like. Ṝέđ ṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a lineReview Me! 03:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Support It's a good image that I believe displays the subject well. Sharpness is sub-par, so it's only a weak support from me. Sharpness aside, good work. Capital photographer (talk) 13:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral While this does lack sharpness it is a very difficult shot to get. Sam Barsoom 20:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * weak support edit, neutral original per requests for a tighter crop on the bird. Matt Deres (talk) 22:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose. The picture is quite encyclopedic, but the tail feathers are out of focus and the background is rather busy and distracting. Nautica Shad es  01:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose, per Nauticashades.--ragesoss (talk) 20:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 12:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)