Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Yarra Panorama

Yarra Panorama




Another Diliff spectacular. At full magnification is ever so slightly less sharp than it perhaps could be (cf. the similar Image:Sydney Harbour Bridge night.jpg), but this seems to me to be of such a minor degree it's hardly an issue. The figures might be a problem. I thought I'd put it up for you experts to decide. Appears in Yarra River, illustrates it very well.

NOTE. I've just discovered a second Diliff work on the Yarra, this one taken at twilight (looks like late twilight to me): Image:Melbourne yarra twilight.jpg. It looks as good IMHO, and I think both deserve FP noms. When voting, perhaps editors could state their preferences for "Night" and/or "Twilight"; is a separate nom necessary?— enceph alon  07:54, 29 September 2005 (UTC) It looks like both of them were popular. Raven4x4x 08:04, 12 October 2005 (UTC) 
 * Nominate and support. Both.— enceph alon  02:06, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Interesting, like the composition. Phoenix2 03:08, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I've added the twilight image to this page as well. As they have almost identical subjects, I don't think creating a seperate nomination page should be necessary. Raven4x4x 08:47, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Raven. Nicely done.— enceph alon  00:27, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Support -- both of them are awesome, although I prefer the full night shot myself. TomStar81 03:07, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Support both, even though I live in the better city of Australia :) Enochlau 04:00, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. JediMaster16 09:57, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Support both as well. It's great to see some wonderful pictures of Australian cities. Raven4x4x 10:27, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Support both but I prefer the twilight version. JoJan 19:24, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Support either, but I too prefer the twilight one. -- Lord Vold e  mort  (Dark Mark) 21:54, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Drool Support both - remarkable.--Deglr6328 03:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support only the Twilight one. The light on it just is slightly better.  --AllyUnion (talk) 21:13, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support both images. They both deserve FP credit, despite their similarities. CapeCodEph 06:18, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support I prefer the twinlight one. Very impressive picture. Mistikal 07:48, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Both. Marvelous work. EZG 10:44, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support both. --Bash 22:39, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support either. --ScottyBoy900Q ∞ 03:12, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support Either of them; they both look great. --Loopy 04:26, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support the twilight image. I think it's lit better. DO'&#1048;eil 06:42, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Both. Twilight version looks better but is at lower res, so I think they're equally worthy. --Fir0002 02:13, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support wow Nixdorf 21:00, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Support both and make Diliff our official Wikimedia photographer! Tito xd (?!?) 01:48, 11 October 2005 (UTC)