Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Yellow Tang

Yellow Tang
Voting period ends on 25 May 2013 at 22:56:28 (UTC)
 * Reason:Nice picture, high EV
 * Articles in which this image appears:Yellow Tang
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
 * Creator:Lviatour


 * Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 22:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Support --King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Support &#39;&#39;&#39;SAMƏK&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 23:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Support – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 01:50, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Support - very nice picture. BNK (talk) 06:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Arctic Kangaroo  (  ✉  •  ✎  ) 13:35, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Oppose it's not exactly sharp. -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  22:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Remove my Oppose vote per the discussion below. -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  21:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Wingtipvortex. Initially, I thought it was my eyes. Arctic Kangaroo  (  ✉  •  ✎  ) 09:47, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I noticed it too, but I thought that was a common thing with underwater photography? I should probably study up on more underwater FPs then. – Kerαu noςco pia ◁ gala xies 19:04, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It is. Tomer T (talk) 19:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If it is just a product of underwater photography, then shouldn't that be overlooked here? I mean, it's a picture of a fish, you kind of have to image it in water. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rreagan007 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 21 May 2013‎
 * Fishes are probably always in water; but photographers may not. Sometimes one can take photograph through the glass standing outside; if it is in an aquarium. In that case, we can demand good quality. But if it is a pure underwater photography like this, we've to compromise more. J Kadavoor J e e 17:40, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 23:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)