Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ National Park

Arches National Park

 * Reason:This is a stunning and sharp image of an double arches taken at Arches National Park.
 * Arches National Park
 * Creator:User: Flicka
 * Support as nominator -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  21:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support the contrast, clarity, and color is good, and the subject is well enough situated to make it feature picture worthy. Rudy Breteler (talk) 21:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Durova Charge! 21:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment This doesn't appear to be a double arch. Can you explain? Is it the view back down the trail coming through the first arch, or how does it work? Clegs (talk) 22:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Response copied off my talk page: "If you look closely, under the first large arch, is a small hole, and you can see another arch. This resembles a double arch. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)" Thanks for clearing this up! Clegs (talk) 23:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment The view through the whole that I think is supposed to double of the arch looks very flat and possibly artifacted, and the shadow under the main arch has some out-of-place pink noise.  Otherwise,  I love this image, and would support if these issues can be fixed or if they can be explained. - Enuja  (talk) 03:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose It's a nice scene but the rocks and the shrub in the lower LHS have a lost a lot of texture from what I suspect was a noise reduction filter. Whether or not this is the case these areas have an unpleasant plasticky texture. --Fir0002 10:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Support Nice picture. —αἰτίας •'discussion'• 15:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support, good lighting and nice angle.  WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN  play it cool.  18:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Per Fir. Cat-five - talk 02:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Schcambo (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 06:47, 8 February 2008 (UTC)