Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/ White Stork

White Stork

 * Reason:A great picture that illustrates the article well.
 * Articles this image appears in:White Stork
 * Creator:Aka

MER-C 04:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator &mdash; Bewareofdog 19:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose. Not bad, but some blown whites, and appears a bit over-sharpened. --Janke | Talk 06:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose Per Janke. -Fcb981 19:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Clear picture of the subject, well focused. High enough resolution.  Nice colours.  I feel it definitely meets the criteria.  Jsc83 18:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose - Quality picture but not special enough for FP promotion. Background is distracting. Alvesgaspar 07:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Support Clear and sharp image.. but a tad oversaturated on the white spots Y zm o  talk  15:02, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak support. Tough trying not to blow out highlights in a bird that is sexually selected for blown-out highlights. As for the background, I'm guessing that's not its actual nest (it looks like we're at ground level), so a selective blur would be defendable. Samsara (talk • contribs) 00:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)