Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/City hall london.jpg

City Hall, London

 * Reason:Does not meet size requirements - It's only 450 x 600. Also, there are blown out highlights and the subject is cut off.
 * Nominator: Mahahahaneapneap


 * Delist &mdash; Mahahahaneapneap 15:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist definitely way too small -Wutschwlllm 00:15, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist Pity it doesn't meet the requirements.... it is a beautiful shot of a beautiful building.  S h a r k f a c e  2 1 7  08:15, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist - yup, good call. Was featured when the requirements were a lot less strict. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 11:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist: Under size requirements. —sd31415   (sign here)  11:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist Sad to see too since the image is very nice. &mdash; Arjun  20:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delist Well I guess we are on patrol for small pictures!! Looks like they had bad weather that night (or at least it was a little foggy).-- ¿  Why  1  9  9  1  ESP. | Sign Here 02:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Because the author was not informed, the only reason is the size, otherwise a very good photo. I though we were over this, as there was another nomination, based only on size that failed. Until we don't get a response from the creator, we don't have to remove this image from FP statue. --Arad 04:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with you that as a matter of courtesy it would be nice if the nominator/creator were warned however most nominations go through delisting without notifying the person so it's not really needed though it would be nice. Cat-five - talk 11:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * To nominator: Please inform the author of the nomination and ask him, if possible, to provide a higher resolution.
 * Delist on size and quality grounds, the size is way too low and the blown out lighting are an issue though I can live with the cutoff of part of the building. Cat-five - talk 11:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Delisted - I asked the photographer, ChrisO, for a higher res version on the 4th of December but he hasn't replied yet. If he can provide a larger image it can always be nominated again. Raven4x4x 06:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)