Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Hazelnuts

Hazelnuts

 * Reason: Too bad resolution for being FP + its not really special.
 * Nominator:  Y zm o  talk


 * Delist &mdash;  Y zm o  talk  17:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delist 8thstar 00:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, Nuts! 8thstar 00:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delist, resolution. - Mailer Diablo 02:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * A more hi-res version has been uploaded, replacing the original image. Care to reconsider, User:Mailer diablo?  Spikebrennan 13:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * A more hi-res version has been uploaded, replacing the original image. Care to reconsider, User:Mailer diablo?  Spikebrennan 13:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delist, not FP quality in my opinion. --KFP (talk | contribs) 19:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral on the high res version. I'd like it better if one or two of the nuts were open. --KFP (talk | contribs) 12:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I have a spare time machine handy, all you have to do is ask. --Michael Billington (talk) 12:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Obviously biased but I love the lighting and composition where you really get a sense of lots of hazelnuts but still get good close up detail (achieved mainly through using "valleys" and crests). By the way guys, thanks for notifying me of this, as I had a higher res version of this image.... --Fir0002 02:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, especially now that the hi-res version has been substituted. I mean really, folks.  This image depicts the subject matter from pretty much every conceivable angle.  What would a better image of hazelnuts look like? Spikebrennan 02:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delist Fails FP criteria #5, as it has no encyclopedic value. -- snowolf D4  (  talk  /  @   ) 08:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Why does it have no enc value? --Fir0002 08:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd say it does, judging by presence use on Hazel, Common Hazel, Nut (fruit), Tu Bishvat, and List of vegetable oils. One would assume that an image with no encyclopædic value wouldn't have a 'file links' list that long. --Michael Billington (talk) 10:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What does it add to the article other than being a "pretty picture"? Per criterion 5 it should "Add value to an article and help readers to understand an article". How does a heap of hazelnuts help the reader understand the article? -- snowolf D4  (  talk  /  @   ) 19:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It shows the subject in detail from almost every angle. - Bevo 21:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

MER-C 11:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Crisp, clear, describes subject matter perfectly. --CableModem^_^ 10:07, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Shows the subject in detail from almost every angle. - Bevo 21:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep A lovely bunch of nuts. mikaultalk 13:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a super image. Just because most people know what a hazelnut looks like doesn't mean it doesn't have enc value. I can't imagine a better photo of the subject and it's v attractive too. Thanks for the October desktop Fir :-) ~ Veledan • Talk 22:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets resolution standards and as mentioned above clearly has encyclopedic value. Cat-five - talk 00:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)