Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Joseph Albert - Ludwig und Malwine Schnorr von Carolsfeld - Tristan und Isolde, 1865e.jpg

Tristan und Isolde - Original production

 * Reason:Suggest we replace this with the restored version. [[Image:Joseph Albert - Ludwig und Malwine Schnorr von Carolsfeld - Tristan und Isolde, 1865f.jpg|250px|Restored version|thumb]]
 * Previous nomination/s:Featured_picture_candidates/Tristan_und_Isolde
 * Nominator: Shoemaker&#39;s Holiday (talk)

with Image:Joseph Albert - Ludwig und Malwine Schnorr von Carolsfeld - Tristan und Isolde, 1865f.jpg. --jjron (talk) 08:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Replace &mdash; Shoemaker&#39;s Holiday (talk) 14:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Is it really a "restoration"? It seems to me it was just darkened (but I could be wrong). Nautica Shad es  15:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I cleaned up a lot of JPEG artefacting in the restored version. Luckily, the original photo has a soft focus, so I could do that with minimal loss of information. Look between the man's legs (and, yes, I realise that sounds dirty, but you know what I mean). Of course, it's not as good as a new scan from the original would be - there's still some signs of it at full resolution - but the chance of getting that scan is almost nil, and I was able to salvage most of the really obviously artefacted areas by careful restoration. Shoemaker&#39;s Holiday (talk) 15:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delist and Replace. I still can't see where the artifacts were removed, but it does look better darkened, so why not? Nautica Shad es  16:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delist and Replace with restored essentially per Nauticashades and like him/her I can't tell the restoration differences really either but I'll take your word for it and it does look better darker. Cat-five - talk 09:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delist and replace with restored version - Seems like a better image. -- Meld    shal   15:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)