Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Mt. Rainier

Mount Rainier

 * Reason:Low resolution
 * Nominator: Punctured Bicycle


 * Delist &mdash; Punctured Bicycle 21:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delist per nom, artifacts also. Debivort 02:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Where? - Mgm|(talk) 09:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There. Debivort 15:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delist wow, low quality. gren グレン 04:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You're confusing quality with resolution. - Mgm|(talk) 09:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Isn't resolution an aspect of quality? gren グレン 04:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delist - resolution, artifacts, subject washed out. !Vote notwithstanding, I really must reiterate that informing the original uploader of the image about the delist nomination is not optional  . Punctured Bicycle (and everyone else), please ensure that you have fully complied with the delist procedure instructions. --YFB  ¿  16:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yelling is unnecessary. Punctured Bicycle 09:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I wasn't yelling - yelling would have been CAPS. I just wanted to make sure it didn't get missed - it's been pointed out several times in the nominations below and people are still not doing it. No offence intended. --YFB ¿  17:23, 29 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delis - Change my vote to Keep when the higher resolution is provided. --Arad 23:47, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delist Yeah, I agree. Nothing special about this. Dark and dull... --Vaelta 17:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * JPEG is a lossy compression technique. Yes, it creates artifacts. The basic idea is that -whith moderate compression- they are unoticeable at normal enlargement ratio. What are you trying to prove by enlarging over 100% ? 62.212.105.216 11:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * What am I trying to proove? Hmmm let's see ... that this particular photo has jpeg artifacts that are too obvious? I only posted the blow up when Mgm couldn't see them at 100%. To me, they were obvious from the start. Debivort 15:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Uploader Comment Hi, I can have the high resolution image uploaded in a couple of weeks --JediMaster16 05:09, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Obi Wan, er, JediMaster, make sure that you don't apply much jpeg compression in the uploaded version, as that was another problem. (Save at like 90% - 100%.) Beautiful shot, aside from this. I hope the high-res version is also detailed. Althepal 17:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Nomination suspended pending high-res version. --YFB ¿  18:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delisted. It seems that the high res version never happened. --KFP (talk | contribs) 18:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC)