Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Pin tumbler locks

Pin tumbler locks

 * Reason:There are new SVG versions of each image. Also, I am proposing that the three vector images be part of a Featured Picture Set, with the one that has no key being the lead image.
 * Previous nomination/s:Featured picture candidates/July-2004
 * Nominator: -- p b r ok s 1 3 talk?


 * Delist and replace  &mdash; -- p b r ok s 1 3 talk? 07:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delist and replace per nom, though I'd like an image without the key, with the tumblers in their original positions.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 21:51, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I made a version with no key; should it be featured along with the other two? -- p b r ok s 1 3 talk? 04:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Perhaps as a FeaturedPictureSet?--HereToHelp (talk to me) 13:32, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That would make sense. Do I need to set up a different nomination to do that? -- p b r ok s 1 3 talk? 18:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know, but probably not, as long as this nom is clear in stating that that is the new intent and remains open for a few weeks (both for the sake of transparency). Featured seats also require a lead image. Logically, that would be the new keyless one, but I think the third one is best at demonstrating the mechanism without accompaniment.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 01:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * (outdent) I added information the proposal of it being a featured set. Also, I think that the keyless one should be the lead, since, as you said, it is the most logical choice. -- p b r ok s 1 3 talk? 05:04, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If nobody comments we might have to move it up to a conventional nom, but in the meantime, what if took image 2 and showed a different key that mis-aligns the tumblers? (Can you make it a different color, to show that it's not the same key?)--HereToHelp (talk to me) 02:55, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, we might have to. I made a "bad key" one. What do you think? -- p b r ok s 1 3 talk? 07:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Excellent image, but if nobody sees them in a few days, start a new nom, especially since it's now listing two brand new images.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 13:52, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The bad key image is fantastic, and I feel that all four of the newer images should be used together, probably in a grid of four, with no key (top left), key (top right), unlocked (bottom left), and bad key (bottom right). But yes, start new noms for each of these four and delist the old png images.-timsdad (talk) 08:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * All separately? With four images, it makes much more sense to do a set.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 22:51, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

The new nomination is located here. However, this delist nom is still up.  --Pbroks13 talk? 09:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC) --Wronkiew (talk) 16:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Obvious Delist since the new one/s have now been promoted separately, basically making the old ones here redundant. --jjron (talk) 11:07, 14 January 2009 (UTC)