Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/praying mantis

Praying mantis
Contributed to the article of the Praying_mantis. High resolution by Shivanayak 07:03, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC) my proposed change to policy. -- brian0918 &#153;  13:22, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Support version 2. Sango  123  16:30, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.png|15px]] Support Version 2 -- ~ 22:58, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.png|15px]] Support v. 2 --Neigel von Teighen 22:59, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.png|15px]] Support Version 2.0 TomStar81 04:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.png|15px]] Support #2. Excellent shot. Would have been nice to have the legs in focus as well, but you can't have everything. --Fir0002 05:23, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.png|15px]] Support version 2. Kaldari 05:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Tacking a picture onto the bottom of an article is not the same as adding significantly to it. Mark1 05:49, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * No longer at the bottom of the article. Yet another reason to support fuck Yeahh
 * Neutral. It's quite a detailed shot, and it would add much to the article, but I have reservations about the background - the artificial grey doesn't go too well - would've been nicer in a natural setting. Enochlau 06:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * So you're saying humans and their products aren't natural? What are we, then? -- brian0918 &#153;  13:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * come...come, it's obvious he means the wild or the great outdoors. Natural meaning not created by humans not natural as in coming from nature. This link is Broken 16:54, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I think you're all just in denial about the role humans play in the world. -- brian0918 &#153;  17:23, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Neutral, I agree with Enochlau. Great shot, but the background is a bit sterile. - Mgm|(talk) 09:15, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support the second This link is Broken 16:54, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.png|15px]] Support Version 2 --Nyr14 June 30, 2005 16:33 (UTC)
 * Support #2, although I would prefer a slightly wider crop about half way between #1 & #2. -- Solipsist 30 June 2005 20:56 (UTC)
 * Support but agree with comment by Solipsist Uwe Kils  [[Image:heringmini.jpg]] July 7, 2005 17:40 (UTC)

10 / 0 / 2 --Spangineer (háblame)  July 9, 2005 13:17 (UTC) 