Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/rays

Crepuscular Rays

 * Reason:Beautiful, and very clear.
 * Articles this image appears in: Golden Gate Park, Crepuscular rays
 * Creator:user:Mbz1


 * Support as nominator -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  01:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support I added the image to Crepuscular Rays. I replaced my own very similar image with this one, so it's OK.  I'd also like to point out that the image is rather rare because as it stated in the caption it shows two sets of rays.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support An encyclopedic and beautiful view of the phenomenon. Shoemaker&#39;s Holiday (talk) 08:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Though, as a native of the Bay Area, I'm a little biased. :) faithless   (speak)  10:46, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support per all above. So THAT'S what they're called. I always just called them "angel rays."  Dr. e  X  treme  12:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support - Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Excellent. --Schcambo (talk) 19:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Isn't it wonderful to have Wikipedia around providing definitions of all that stuff none of the grownups we asked knew the names for when we asked, years ago? Now I'll try to remember how to spell this...  Durova Charge! 20:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Wow. Cuyler  91093  ( Contribs ) 00:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Incredible! Djk3 (talk) 01:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support truly eye catching, M.K. (talk) 10:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Yeees, nice one! - Darwinek (talk) 11:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Great photo.  crassic\talk 18:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Matt Deres (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support I like it.  Enigma  msg! 06:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Totally awesome --Blacknightshade (talk) 00:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Totally awesome --Blacknightshade (talk) 00:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 09:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)