Wikipedia:Featured picture candidatesImage/Clay Anderson spacewalk

Clay Anderson's spacewalk

 * Reason:This image has unbelievable clarity, and is very sharp. This is a very crisp, clean and beautiful image.
 * Articles this image appears in:Clay Anderson
 * Creator:NASA (uploaded by - Ohmpandya  We need to talk... ♦ contribs 21:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC))


 * Support as nominator - Ohmpandya  We need to talk... ♦ contribs 21:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support This is an exceptional photo! Very clear, with a cool background. Neutral Based on the objections raised by several others. Clegs (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Not perfect, but very nice nonetheless.--HereToHelp 22:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose, white caption bar is not acceptable, NASA image flood on FPC is just boring. I don't find the images exceptional, except that they are taken at a place where the usual contriibutor cannot easily go. But then we might just tag every NASA image FP. --Dschwen 23:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Dschwen. The large bar on the left side is also distracting.  I think it has very limited encyclopedic value to Clay Anderson.  Looking at the photo I can't even tell if the subject is a male or female, much less who it is.  Cacophony (talk) 00:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * So crop it!--HereToHelp 00:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Support - very nice.   jj137  ♠ 00:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Regretful Oppose Both Original and Edit 1 Original has the distracting bar, while Edit 1 has some focus issues. While they are both amazing shots, they are not the best of what Wikipedia has to offer. -- Shark face  217  01:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

MER-C 02:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

NOTE: I recently discovered that this image isn't even Clayton. It's Rick Mastracchio according to NASA. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 20:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)