Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Saudi Arabia


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured portal candidate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the portal's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The portal was not promoted by OhanaUnited 05:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC).

Portal:Saudi Arabia
Nominated the portal as edited thoroughly plus many errors and unwanted chunks repaired/deleted. Plus, the portal has 15 Good articles, 3 Featured articles, 7 DYK hooks, News section included and Featured picture section. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 07:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

In general a very useful portal! I have a few issues with it that should be addressed before I can support though: If you can take care of these things I would be happy to support. Thanks for the hard work! Wugapodes (talk) 21:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comments by Wugapodes
 * The featured city has a large number of images that make it difficult to read.
 * In the "Things you can do" section, the "Join the Saudi Wikiproject and help us expanding our topics" sentence feels self referential.
 * I'm not sure about the web content. I'm not sure if it complies (or needs to comply) with the external linking policy and feels counter to the purpose of a portal. The purpose of a portal is an entry point to Wikipedia content, and having a large section of external links feels counter to that.
 * Support Changes look good! Best of luck. Wugapodes (talk) 17:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Support from an IP Seems better work on this portal. 182.72.94.54 (talk) 13:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * This IP address has only a handful of edits. All of which were on the same articles as the nominator and one of which was used to upvote a DYK? nomination by D'SuperHero. Just saying.  Jolly  Ω   Janner  21:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Further mentioning that D'SuperHero has since attempted to strike out my comment.  Jolly  Ω   Janner  09:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

, Fixed the above issues and moreover added some data to give a good look-and-feel of the portal. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 13:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment:

I'm concerned by Jolly Janner's diff showing alleged votestacking. At this point, after ignoring the IP's support, this nomination only garned 1 support and no sufficient consensus to promote. have you notified project pages? I don't see evidence of such activity. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

This is a difficult close. There was limited support and a neutral party discovered possible votestacking and subsequent cover up that simply cannot be discounted. On paper, this would have been promoted if we go by number of people supporting minus number of people opposing. But since there's a cloud hanging over the nomination, I conclude that there is no consensus to promote at this time. OhanaUnitedTalk page 05:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.