Wikipedia:Featured portal review/New South Wales


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured portal review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of this discussion was delist. OhanaUnitedTalk page 03:08, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Portal:New South Wales

 * Notified: WP:WikiProject New South Wales and its parent project, WP:WikiProject Australia; and Users:, , and  (original nominator). Could not notify User:Spebi - page protected, user inactive. --Elekhh (talk) 02:28, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 

Fails 1(b) "attractive" and 1(d) "well-maintained". The very low number of views (below 500 in December 2010) suggest limited usefulness. --Elekhh (talk) 02:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1(b) Is not attractive: page layout is unbalanced, uses low quality graphics (Australia map), lack of contrast between title font colour and its background, red links.
 * 1(d) It is not well maintained.It seems to have had limited activity after creation and subsequent promotion to featured status, with almost no discussion regarding maintenance or improvements on the talk page.
 * DYK was last updated in 2007.
 * Selected picture not maintained since 2008. (With 4 days exception in 2010)
 * Selected article not maintained since 2008. (With the exception of December 2010 SA which repeated October 2008 SA)
 * News section recently removed as not maintained for two years and "unlikely to be regularly adjusted".


 * Speedy delist; under the criteria, portals not maintained for more than three months will be summarily demoted. However, for some reason, neither of the current FPo Directors seem willing to enforce this, and perhaps the criteria need to be discussed - there's no point in having this threat if no-one enforces it. BencherliteTalk 11:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Can someone let me know if/when either or both of these is delisted, for The Signpost? Tony   (talk)  12:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.