Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates/Attention

Attention
This file adds significantly to the following article:
 * At attention


 * Nominate and support. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:09, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support But I should warn most of these bugle calls are getting grouped into one day on the main page. They're too short to do otherwise. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Very nice :) 1 day of bugle calls, my heaven :P — James (Talk • Contribs) • 8:34pm • 10:34, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Promoted Attention.ogg --Acather96 (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Is there any chance we can date this one? If not, tell me and I'll run this through promotion as undated, I just don't want to do that if I don't have to.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  00:54, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd say mid 2000's. — James (Talk • Contribs) • 11:04am • 01:04, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't we date by composition and not performance.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * That's true, I thought if the composition date was unknown it'd be dated by performance. It could always be added as an unknown. — James (Talk • Contribs) • 2:46pm • 04:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Zginder 2011-04-19T23:49Z (UTC)

