Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates/Four more U.S. Air Force Marches

Four more U.S. Air Force Marches
These pieces are just fun, and very well played.


 * Nominate and support. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:16, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Fantastic performances, I like Troopers Tribunal and The Outlook most of all, what lively pieces, USAF's marches are superbly played. —  Ancient Apparition •  Champagne?  • 5:04pm • 07:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not sure why these are all grouped together, but I Support them all.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:23, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * They're grouped togther because it saves Adam roughly two minutes and seventeen seconds to set up and saves the closers upwards of five times that. When these are promoted they should be counted as four items (in four parts).  S ven M anguard   Wha?  16:18, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The first one, is the volume fluctuation on purpose?  S ven M anguard   Wha?  16:18, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't hear any volume changes particularly untypical of marches. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:20, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support 2 Still on the fence on the other ones. My concern is with their use. Do the pieces not have articles? If so are the pieces themselves notable? Can these be spread around anywhere else? I don't know enough about marches to know if there are genres that these fit into or where else these could be placed.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  16:26, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * They're reasonably notable, but coverage of marches on Wikipedia isn't that great. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:10, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Promoted all since sven didn't fully oppose 1,3,& 4 --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  17:46, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

