Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates/White Noise

White Noise

 * Nominate and support. In actu (Guerillero) &#124; My Talk  20:59, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Neutral The recording passes my tests for "noisiness", but I am concerned about the low bit rate. Lossy compression like vorbis are designed to be used for non-noise audio.  I would think that the highest bit rate possible should be used for noise. Zginder 2011-04-23T22:21Z (UTC)
 * Does it look better now? --In actu (Guerillero) &#124; My Talk  22:44, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * What is the difference between white noise and static?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:46, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Static is whit noise laied on top of some other sound such as a radio station --In actu (Guerillero) &#124; My Talk  03:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose—Unless someone can tell me why this file is clever in some way; that is, was it hard to produce? A file of white noise certainly has EV, but why does this exemplify "our very best work"? Tony   (talk)  06:12, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support After a lot of reflection, I think that this is an important sound file for WP. There is an elaborate article on this subject, for which this has high EV.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support The feature criteria do not require this to be our best work, just as good as it can be. Zginder 2011-04-24T17:54Z (UTC)
 * Support — James (Talk • Contribs) • 12:15pm • 02:15, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

 Promoted Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:23, 2 May 2011 (UTC)