Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 July 16



Image:Brandon_Graham,_Nacosta,_music,_2007.jpg

 * Image:Brandon_Graham,_Nacosta,_music,_2007.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Nacosta Music ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 00:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Familyjewelsdvd.jpg

 * Image:Familyjewelsdvd.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Donaldd23 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Used only in a gallery, with no critical commentary about the DVD or DVD cover. Videmus Omnia Talk  01:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I feel that for an article about a film, the DVD cover is one of the most important images that could be included. A critical commentary about the DVD or its cover is irrelevant.  I see many DVD covers in film articles that are not "discussed", they are merely used to help the article.  I feel that deleting this image would be wrong as DVD covers are almost as important to a film's article as a theatrical poster.  Donaldd23 01:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This is an exceedingly poor image of the DVD cover. IMO it does not contribute anything useful. A better (larger, square-on) image could arguably be used in the infobox instead of the poster, to represent the primary visual image associated with the film.  But this image is not it.  Delete. Jheald 23:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Timothy Edelbach.jpeg

 * Image:Timothy Edelbach.jpeg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Jamie617 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Not used. Mikemill 01:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * And, it appears, not useful. -- But | seriously | folks   02:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Christus Ravenna Mosaic2.jpg

 * Image:Christus Ravenna Mosaic2.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by User:Bilanovic ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Seems to exist only for use in vandalism to Jesus — Zazaban 02:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Brawl.jpg

 * Image:Brawl.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Nununu ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Looks like a collage of copyrighted characters or a video game screenshot. Nv8200p talk 03:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Brckojjjjjj.png

 * Image:Brckojjjjjj.png ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Sampita ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 03:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vandeventer.jpg

 * Image:Vandeventer.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Pepso2 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Non-free image of someone not mentioned in the article. Probably living. – Quadell (talk) (random) 03:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, he's living. This is a 2002 photo of Robert Van Deventer, who was a major network radio personality during the 1940s as a teenager, and there's a full paragraph about him in the article. The entire Van Deventer family made up the panel of the radio show Twenty Questions. This photo is, I believe, by the Poughkeepsie DJ Bill Eberle. After an extensive search, this is the only photo I could find of any Twenty Questions panelist. it appeared without copyright notice or credit on Eberle's site. Eberle has taken quite a few other recent photos of 1930s/1940s radio personalities. I would like to contact him about using his photos. If so, what procedure or what copyright tag would be appropriate? Pepso2 06:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Eberle has taken quite a few other recent photos of 1930s/1940s radio personalities. I would like to contact him about using his photos. If so, what procedure or what copyright tag would be appropriate? Pepso2 13:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The official Wikipedia guideline for requesting permission is at Requesting copyright permission. One user who has had a great deal of success with this lists his tips and tricks at User:Videmus Omnia/Free Images. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Will check. Pepso2 13:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bedlamingoliath.jpg

 * Image:Bedlamingoliath.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Crazymigit182 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Confirmed fake album cover (vandalism)

Image:HeidiKlum.JPG

 * Image:HeidiKlum.JPG ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Joeran ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Screenshot showing a woman's face. It doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that can't conveyed with free text or images. Abu badali (talk) 12:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Conservape-tan.png

 * Image:Conservape-tan.png ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Krimpet ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Unencyclopedic - This is a vaguely offensive and poor quality derivative of Image:Wikipe she needs your help2.png which isn't used in any articles. — TomTheHand 14:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree, though the editor took his time to make this, it seems too much like a waste of resources to me, it is pointless to keep it. It's the same as if someone would take an image and flip it. Also, I believe we should delete some of the other more random images, like Image:Wikipe-tan Battling a Wikitroll in the Darknesses of Ignorance.JPG. Nefzen 17:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep used in Wikipe-tan. Also suggesting move to Commons, which is a free image repository. ( [ →] vish  win60  - is User:O in 1 day (possibly)) 14:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It was added to the Wikipe-tan gallery a couple of days ago as a Wikipe-tan variant; I think it's strange to call that "used in Wikipe-tan." TomTheHand 16:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Still doesn't matter. There are multiple variants of Wikipe-tan on that page, including a person who looked like one. ( [ →] vish  win60  - is User:O in 1 day (possibly)) 16:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Not sure that I follow. Are you saying that any Wikipe variant one could cook up and link on the Wikipe-tan page deserves to be kept?  If not, what makes this a keeper? TomTheHand 17:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, useful to someone. – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * To who? How?  How could this image possibly be used to build a better encyclopedia? TomTheHand 20:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep. Image is properly licensed. Obtain consensus for removal from the page at Wikipedia talk:Wikipe-tan and we can delete it for being a orphan.  howcheng  {chat} 20:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed. This is a redundancy on the Wikipe-tan page, and there are enough pictures there as it is. I also strongly recommend removing some other images in that manner, like those overall bad images that look like they are made (and badly) with paint, like Image:Wikipetan tries to hold off the WikiOgres.png. Those are completely useless and annoying. I feel they reduce the value of Wikipe-tan, and Wikipedia in general. Nefzen 19:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as "vaguely offensive" is not a criteria for deletion, and it's better quality than several other derivative Wikipe-tan images. It's not uploaded under fair use, so lack of being used isn't a valid criteria for deletion. Appears to be properly licensed (though it may need a GFDL tag in addition to the CC tag). I can see no valid reasons for deletion. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Unencyclopedic and low quality are both criteria for deletion. TomTheHand 15:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Then aren't you saying that all of the other Wikipe-tan images should be deleted too? ( [ →]O - RLY?) 15:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * ...No? I'm saying that Wikipe-tan ripoffs that are offensive and poorly done should be deleted. TomTheHand 15:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep but move to commons. Not offensive to anybody with a sense of humor, but Commons is a better repository for free images, this indeed does not belong on Wikipedia.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 15:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please do not make personal attacks in IFD discussions! TomTheHand 15:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I'ts not very high quality and rather offensive to conservstives. — Y Ø R Ø Z U ! 万 Talk 15:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * keep Eh it isn't lolicon this time.Geni 00:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If she is portrayed as a group of people, one would hope it would generally be positive or neutral. Afro-tan, for example, doesn't seem to be negative. So the negative portrayal is what does it for me. You could make a Wikipe-tan nun and I probably wouldn't have a second thought about it. (anime and nuns... happens all the time) With the lolicon image deletion, maintaining a good image for Wikipe-tan does seem to be in the interest of the community. It's generally safe to say that we don't want Wikipe-tan to be a sexually active 12 year old girl, or a nazi, or a pissed off religious zealot who's getting ready to backhand some child for saying "penis". Wikipe-tan can be sad, even angry, but she shouldn't really cause readers to be angry (within reason, since some people will find very silly reasons to get angry).  And it's not really that we're protecting her image, or saying "zomg, you can't do that!". It's just.. this image, for whatever reason, we don't want it on Wikipedia. It's not like I completely dislike the image (the image has been saved in my own copy of Wikipe-tan images), it's just.. doesn't seem like a good idea for it to be here. -- Ned Scott 02:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * So do you say suggest moving this to Commons and not have it show up in the Wikipe-tan page? ( [ →]O - RLY?) 16:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I would prefer it to not be on Wikimedia's servers at all. -- Ned Scott 19:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to commons It's actually kind of funny--but belongs there, not here. Cary Bass demandez 17:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Evidently she's already been moved. delete from here!  Cary Bass demandez 17:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Moved to Commons (even though she lacks a firearm). Rama 17:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Since it has been moved to commons, delete per TomTheHand. I   (said)  (did) 08:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Moved to Commons.  howcheng  {chat} 16:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was:

Image:Iraqi_Sniper.jpg

 * Image:Iraqi_Sniper.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Idleguy ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Non-free news agency (New York Times) photo used to illustrate events being depicted in photo, failing WP:NFCC #2 and #8 and possibly #1. Now it's argued on the image description page that the photo itself was controversial. If article(s) can be rewritten to talk about the controversy and those statements are backed up with citations to reliable sources, then I will happily withdraw this nomination.  howcheng  {chat} 17:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I'm being obtuse, but I don't see anything indicating this is a NYT photo. Do you have a source? 69.143.136.139 21:03, 25 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Remove from Iraq War. This image is not the story. Jheald 23:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * And neither is it being proposed as the story, yet it tells a very telling part of it through its medium. If the picture violates copyright laws, I can see justification for removal, but other than that I believe it has every right to belong where it is.
 * Extra strong keep I want to ask you people just one thing. What is wikipedia? A NEUTRAL encyclopidia. Now how can we talk about the Iraq war only one-sidedly, only from the perspectiv of one side. If you look all of the articles and sub-articles about the Iraq war you will see only images of American soldiers. Only American soldiers. Except for this one image there is no other image of the other sides fighters. This image is needed for the balanced representation of the war. If we only show images of American soldiers this only becomes an American war. What about the insurgents? This is their war also. The problem here is, by some of you, the thing that the images made of insurgents are exclusivly made by AP or other news agencys reporters. And so what do you intend to do? To wait 20 or 30 years until the copyright on those images expaiers and than put in the images. We NEED at least this ONE image to represent those fighting the Americans and the coalition or Wikipedia is not neutral at all. At least this one image. The image has been used in only two articles. Jheald said the image is not the story. No it's not the story, it represents the story. It's used in the main Iraq war article in the section about the militias fighting the Americans, and in the article about the Iraq spring fighting of 2004 in the part where it is talked about the fighting in Najaf, well the image was taken in Najaf during that fighting. What do you think if we had only images of Allied soldiers in the World war two article and not of the German soldiers? What opinion would readers have of the war? We need this image so not just the Iraq war article but also Wikipedia can stay balanced and neutral. Just this one image.Top Gun
 * Guess what, that's one way how the New York Times makes money, by selling licenses to use this photo in stories that discuss Iraqi insurgents and whatnot. Why is Wikipedia exempt from having to pay them for it? As I said at the beginning, if an article (or a section thereof) can be rewritten to discuss the controversy surrounding this image such that we no longer have a choice about whether the image should be shown or not, then we have a much stronger case. Only laziness is stopping us from keeping the image.  howcheng  {chat} 20:05, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: when DoD releases a PD photo of an insurgent or many of them, we will talk about it -- TheFE ARgod (Ч) 09:43, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Image deleted per WP:NFCC #2 and #8. -Nv8200p talk 19:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Fredthompsonwatergate2.jpg

 * Image:Fredthompsonwatergate2.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Stills64 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Non-free press agency (Associated Press) photo, where the photo is not required for the reader's comprehension, thus failing both WP:NFCC #2 and #8.  howcheng  {chat} 17:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep This non-free media contributes significantly to the article. It significantly increases readers' understanding of the topic in a way that words alone cannot, by visually showing the Senate Watergate committee that brought down President Nixon. It conveys the somber and serious atmosphere at the time, and visually shows the central role played by Fred Thompson. This photo is historic and very relevant to the article in which it is used. It is also the only photo in that article showing Thompson as a young man. Subsequent to when this photo was uploaded, its size and resolution were reduced to ensure fair use.Ferrylodge 18:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The photo is not necessary at all to convey the supposed "somber and serious atmosphere at the time". And in any case, we need a better argument than "it's very convenient for us" in order to use an image from AP. --Abu badali (talk) 15:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: It is not evident to me that a free equivalent does not exist; I would expect official U.S. government photos of this committee. I do not see how this photo visually shows the central role played by Fred Thompson, or how this photo conveys more information than the sentence "Fred Thompson played an important role in the somber and serious Senate Watergate committee." Finally, it is not clear to me why we need to show Thompson as a young man, or if we do, why a free photo of a young Thompson does not exist. —Bkell (talk) 04:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep While I agree that a free image would be best, a newspaper (AP photo) was the only one I found that would fit that section of the article. If it's a question of relevance or notability, I'm a bit confused since that whole section talked about his involvement in the Watergate hearings. I also feel the image helps the reader identify more with that section in terms already stated by Ferrylodge. Stills64 14:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment If there is still objection to the photo after what I and Stills64 have said, then please consider the following proposal. The photo has already been reduced in size and resolution, but it has not yet been cropped.  I think it could be cropped as shown here.  What do you think?Ferrylodge 00:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, sadly. We absolutely cannot use an AP photograph except under exceptional circumstances. The AP makes its living licensing these images to news organizations to use, and our use could be seen as directly competing with these paying customers, violating NFCC #2. I know, it's an important and non-replaceable image. But that's not enough. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I have substituted a new photo instead of the AP photo.Ferrylodge 16:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:LUchampion.jpg

 * Image:LUchampion.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Alberto Fernandez ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Non-free image of a championship softball team. Does not show anything that cannot be conveyed in words alone, thus violating WP:NFCC #8  howcheng  {chat} 17:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Marmon-Herrington_anniversary.jpg

 * Image:Marmon-Herrington_anniversary.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Logares1 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Non-free advertisement used only for decorative purposes.  howcheng  {chat} 17:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Company would be better represented by logo, plus free images of any particularly important trucks. Jheald 23:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Van_on_bike.png

 * Image:Van_on_bike.png ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Bakahito ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Non-free screenshot used in article without any commentary about the scene being depicted, violating WP:NFCC #8.  howcheng  {chat} 17:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:DAI_ShinjitsuNoUta.jpg

 * Image:DAI_ShinjitsuNoUta.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by ReyBrujo ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Non-free screenshot used in article without any commentary on the scene being depicted, violating WP:NFCC #8.  howcheng  {chat} 17:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Same as the other, feel free to delete it. -- ReyBrujo 02:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:DAI_8_Heart.jpg

 * Image:DAI_8_Heart.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by ReyBrujo ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Non-free screenshot used in article without any commentary on the scene being depicted, violating WP:NFCC #8.  howcheng  {chat} 17:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Feel free to delete it, I uploaded it... geez, almost two years ago. -- ReyBrujo 02:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ronmink.jpg

 * Image:Ronmink.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Ksuwildcats10 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Images was uploaded under fair use rational and is not being used in accordance with the fair use policy to use it for identification and critical commentary on the station ID or program and its contents — Grey Wanderer | Talk 18:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jesse_metcalfe8.jpg

 * Image:Jesse_metcalfe8.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Smartballa4life ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Screenshot of role used in actor's page, not enough commentary to justify NFCC #8 – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bebo_layout.jpg

 * Image:Bebo_layout.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Universearle ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Looks like a copyvio, not used in any articles – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Norbit2.jpg

 * Image:Norbit2.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Captain-poison ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Copyvio, attack image – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:36, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete by me as a copyvio/attack image. Do not know how to close these though. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Breakdance_street_paris.jpg

 * Image:Breakdance_street_paris.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Wintran ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Non Commercial Creative commons license on flickr DieInquisitor 19:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pulse_LED.jpg

 * Image:Pulse_LED.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Nick ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Unnecessary fair use DieInquisitor 19:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * ugly, uninformative picture David in DC 21:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This was a unique marketing feature, as discussed in the article, and a picture of it would be appropriate for fair use. But I'm afraid this pic is horrible.  For that reason, delete. Jheald 23:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:AAMilne_Myfarmpic.jpg

 * Image:AAMilne_Myfarmpic.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Nick ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphaned, no description, location date, low resolution DieInquisitor 20:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * it is GFDL. I dont think there is a policy against orphaned images as long as they are not fair use.  May better belong at commons though. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Polandukraineuefa2012.gif

 * Image:Polandukraineuefa2012.gif ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Akhristov ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * not needed fair use DieInquisitor 20:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I beg to disagree. The image is important to portray the event in question.--Riurik(discuss) 14:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The logo image is necessary for the article illustration.Ans-mo 14:29, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, notable logo.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 15:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Reduced low-resolution version has been uploaded per suggestion; see here - Image:Uefa2012polandukrainelogo.gif. Withdraw objection to high-res deletion.--Riurik(discuss) 05:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Per trademark law, it is important to present the logo in a size and resolution sufficient to maintain the quality intended by the company, so as to avoid tarnishing or misrepresenting the organization's brand image. Whilst I would agree the original image was probably too big, this smaller image makes the "cuts" in the solid lines look like dirt or noise.  A 300 x 300 image (WP's rule of thumb for "low resolution") would be more appropriate.  Such an image for UEFA Euro 2012 would be in compliance with the guidance on the use of logos for identification at WP:FAIR.  Jheald 23:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted for being orphaned non-free image.  howcheng  {chat} 16:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Canadianethnicities2.png

 * Image:Canadianethnicities2.png ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Bigjarom ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * map appears to be based on original research, no sources listed for map making to show supposed ethnic areas, 'french' covers no area on map including quebec (which is french majority speaking...) DieInquisitor 21:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Data appears to be sourced from Statistics Canada's official site here. WP:OR has a specific exemption (here) to allow the creation of charts from reliably sourced data. Jheald 00:09, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept.  howcheng  {chat} 16:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:W173.gif

 * Image:W173.gif ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Ashleyjoyce ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * A non-free image of a Set-n-forget Deep Fryer being manufactured. But the item's manufacture is not discussed in the article. – Quadell (talk) (random) 22:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Quadell Jheald 00:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:WDIeverest.jpg

 * Image:WDIeverest.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Speedway ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Concept art for a Disney ride. We have free pics of the ride itself, and the concept art is not discussed in the article. – Quadell (talk) (random) 22:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Quadell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:WWII_print_advertisement_for_Baldwin_Little_Giants.jpg

 * Image:WWII_print_advertisement_for_Baldwin_Little_Giants.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Lordkinbote ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * An ad for locomotives in an article that does not mention the ad itself – Quadell (talk) (random) 22:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Kept. PD-Pre1978.  howcheng  {chat} 16:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Walker_Promo.jpg

 * Image:Walker_Promo.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Jrc2006 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * An ad, used in an article that doesn't mention the ad. NFCC #8 violation. – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wag67_advert1.jpg

 * Image:Wag67_advert1.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Plasticboob ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Ad, used only in an article which doesn't mention the ad. NFCC #8 violation. – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:04, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Image:Warhammer40kPromo.JPG

 * Image:Warhammer40kPromo.JPG ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Q Original ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Hi-res image, used decoratively – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Image used for ilustration of forthcoming RPG Game.LexingtonDark 16:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Reduce to 400x300 per WP rule of thumb on resolution Jheald 00:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Resized and kept with the understanding that once the game is released, it will be replaced by an image of the box cover.  howcheng  {chat} 17:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:Warpath-boxart.jpg

 * Image:Warpath-boxart.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Mathewignash ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Promo image of a transformer, could be replaced by free photo of toy – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Image had licensing info now. user:mathewignash
 * keep- replaceable fair use only applies pictures of living persons and buildings. Images of toys are never considered free even if you took the photo  Int92 17:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: rfu does not only apply to pictures and buildings. It applies to toys as well. The character is copyrighted, and fair-use claim will have to made on the use of the toy character in a free image, but the image would still be free. We can't use a non-free image of a non-free toy when we could use a free image of that non-free toy. – Quadell (talk) (random) 01:30, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * comment:theres no such thing as a free image of a non free toy, the character is copyrighted and any images showing copyrighted material is not (and is never) considered a free image and as the rational states there are no free images of the toy nor any images can be created since hasbro no longer makes the toy anymor. and the licence can be easly changed to cover art. Int92 11:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - licensing info. claims that it is a promotional image, but source is a fan site -- neither image here nor fan site identifies advertisement or press packet whence it came. Additionally, the "critical commentary" that this and most other -boxart images accompany is plut summary and OR. --EEMeltonIV 07:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:WTOG84A.jpg

 * Image:WTOG84A.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Azumanga1 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Ad, used only in gallery, article has nothing to do with this ad – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:WNKCC.JPG

 * Image:WNKCC.JPG ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Yaguruma ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Informational image, but not in English – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Would it suffice to add a translation of the pictured text in the caption? --70.142.32.73 15:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm afraid it's copyrighted content. -- ざくら 木 17:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:WJRT-1950sStudios.jpeg

 * Image:WJRT-1950sStudios.jpeg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Azumanga1 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Postcard, only used in gallery, and article doesn't mention anything depicted – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:WaveriderBA.jpg

 * Image:WaveriderBA.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Maranomerau ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Artist's rendition of transformer toy, could be replaced by free photo of said toy – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)