Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 June 12



June 12

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was:

Image:Continuum-White.jpg

 * Image:Continuum-White.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Lincalinca ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Not an album cover (description says inside sleeve).- Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 14:54, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - This is the actual cover of the album, the other covers are facades that wrap as an outer slip. This is the cover of the album's sleeve booklet. I urge to adjust the tag to explain what it is and keep it based on that. -- linca linca  01:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I relisted this with the other six images, for clarification. – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Enyaaward.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Deleted. Does not meet WP:NFCC #8. In order to do so, the words, "Enya won a Grammy Award" would have to be not understandable without the image.  howcheng  {chat} 18:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Enyaaward.jpg ( [ delete] &#124; talk &#124; [ history] &#124; [ logs] ) - uploaded by Brian_Honne ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Unnecessary unfree screenshot showing an artist receiving an award (although "irreplaceable", it doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text). Abu badali (talk) 12:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I don't think it quite violates our policies. It seems more informative than decorative to me. – Quadell (talk) (random) 23:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * What information does it adds to the article's comprehension, and why can't this information be conveyed with a free alternative (text or image)? --Abu badali (talk) 04:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.