Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 May 22



Image:Jarly 3445 2008 May 2.jpg

 * Image:Jarly 3445 2008 May 2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Santros57Q ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphaned unfree image which should be easily replaceable. Fails WP:FU  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 00:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Breakdown.jpg

 * Image:Breakdown.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Santros57Q ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphaned unfree image which should be easily replaceable. Fails WP:FU  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 00:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Carly Benson Corinthos 2000.jpg

 * Image:Carly Benson Corinthos 2000.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Santros57Q ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphaned unfree image which should be easily replaceable. Fails WP:FU  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 00:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:KGBarnett.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was deleted  Alex  Muller   22:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * This is a personal image that was uploaded my me that I would like deleted ASAP - or else face divorce proceedings via my loving, strong and protective husband who thinks I'm going to be stalked, stolen, killed, and/or beaten to a pulp, along with our children (even though they are not in the photo). :p Feel better, honey? KGBarnett (talk) 03:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I uploaded another image over the the prior versions. I would like all versions to be deleted for privacy reasons. Thank you.--KGBarnett (talk) 04:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:ASHPOS.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was deleted  Alex  Muller   22:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Image:ASHPOS.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Bigfellahull ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphan - Personal picture that I would like removed. Thank You. Bigfellahull (talk) 11:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Azdbacksnewuni.jpg

 * Image:Azdbacksnewuni.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Provine ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Doubtful source (web resolution image) and orphaned anyway so no possible fair use claim Nilfanion (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cataract_logo.jpg

 * Image:Cataract_logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Jaberucg ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphaned trademarked image - also possibly copyrightable. Nilfanion (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Steve Dinneen.jpg

 * Image:Steve Dinneen.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Dirtyweeman ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Checking the Steve Dinneen article and the uploader's contribs, I do not believe this image to be what it purports to be. Not to mention the lack of licensing information, and I'll wager the uploader has no intention of adding it. Jaysweet (talk) 15:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Image 00025.jpg

 * Image:Image 00025.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Avneet singh sethi ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphaned UE image. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:David Hilton.JPG

 * Image:David Hilton.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Davehilton ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphaned UE image. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:The_Plot_by_Will_Eisner.jpg

 * Image:The_Plot_by_Will_Eisner.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Stormwatch ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Unneeded book cover used only for decarative use. Garion96 (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hitler signature.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was Keep, there is already an ongoing discussion, but the uploader had removed the notice see Jackaranga (talk) 12:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Image:Hitler signature.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Dimboukas ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Quoted:
 * Description :signature of adolf hitler
 * Source :self-made
 * Date :1940
 * I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain.
 * I find it highly unlikely that the uploader is Adolf Hitler, and if he is then he should submit an OTRS ticket like anyone else, I don't think self-made can in this case be considered a valid source, and thus the image should be deleted, as the copyright status and authenticity are unverifiable. Jackaranga (talk) 20:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep and change tag to Template:PD-ineligible. Signatures fall into the "typographic ornamentation" / "mere lettering" category and are not protected by US copyright; the signature article itself says so. — xDanielx  T/C\R 04:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure the wikimedia foundation ever intended for users to violate foreign copyrights simply because it may be legal (or not as the American law only seems to say signatures can't attract copyright in the USA, not that copyrighted signatures loose their copyright in the USA). You realise obviously that Hitler didn't live in the USA, if you read Copyright it would seem we should try to acknowledge foreign copyrights.  Regardless, according to Jimbo Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, Wikipedia contributors should respect the copyright law of these nations as best they can, the same as they do for other countries around the world  Jackaranga (talk) 11:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The WMF servers reside in the US, hence we are obliged to follow US copyright law. Sometimes the copyright status of a work in the US depends on the copyright status of the work in the country where it was published, but that isn't the case here. It may be nice to respect other copyright laws voluntarily, but it wouldn't be appropriate to delete images on that basis, especially when the issue isn't that the image violates any particular law but just that we (presumably) don't know enough about German copyright law to say with complete certainty that it doesn't. — xDanielx  T/C\R 19:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry about this I hadn't noticed there was already an ongoing deletion discussion for this signature, the uploader User:Dimboukas removed the deletion template from the image page, as he has just done yet again for this nomination. See Possibly unfree images/2008 April 8 for the original discussion.  The uploader should at least acknowledge the source though, and provide the correct license template, as well as not removing deletion notices.  Jackaranga (talk) 12:05, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.