Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 August 28



File:Baitullah Mehsud.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Baitullah Mehsud.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Neurolysis ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Although this file is titled "Baitullah Mehsud", it is not of Baitullah Mehsud. It is of Abdullah Mehsud (see pictures:, , , and ). Baitullah looks like this: and . The page Abdullah Mehsud already has a picture in public domain,  File:Abdullah Mehsud -- most wanted poster.png. So this picture serves no purpose. As it is not free content, and as its name is gravely misleading, it should be deleted. The page on which this image is found (Baitullah Mehsud) is currently linked to the main page, and should therefore be dealt with quickly. One of the two actual images of Baitullah to which I have provided links should probably be uploaded instead. (I do not believe any other images are available of him.) — The Man in Question  (gesprec)  ·  (forðung)  01:35, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You could have notified me, that would have been helpful. G7'd. — neuro  (talk)  04:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:James mercer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: per F8. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:James mercer.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Acidkingz ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Poor quality image that could be of any person. Aspects (talk) 02:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CSD--Rockfang (talk) 02:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Nanjing photos

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: - DElete - improbable collection on camera's - Peripitus (Talk) 10:36, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Xuanwuhuskyline.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 02:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Njdowntown08.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 02:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Nanjingdt3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 02:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Njdowntown2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 02:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Jiulonghupanaroma.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 02:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Usr:Godofnanjing has been uploading lots of Nanjing photos for at least a year and a half now, but many of them lack source information other than a claim that they are "self made"...and judging from the many redlinks in his upload log, almost all of which are deleted copyvio images, I am hesitant to trust many of these "self made" claims. Looking at the metadata for the images that have it, a lot of these images were taken from all kinds of different cameras and edited on all kinds of different image editing programs. Some might be legit (for example, some he uploaded within a day after they were taken, which means they are probably more likely to be his), but many are lacking proper information and without that information the 'self-made' claims are questionable. Listed above are just the five most recent ones I came across. I have e-mailed Godofnanjing asking him to comment here. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 02:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Five-bar swordtail.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Five-bar swordtail.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Samsagar ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * User's only edit is to upload this image. Though it is tagged with GFDL-self, the image has (c) Sameer Ali in the bottom right corner.  This user might be Sameer, but we have no way of knowing.  IUP says that credits in the image itself are not permitted.  Paragraph 4.D. of the GFDL says that modifications to the statement of copyright are not permitted.  So even if the uploader is Sameer Ali, we don't have the ability to bring this image into conformance with our image use policy - unless he affirms that this is his image and removes the copyright statement, it needs to be deleted.  It's a shame because it's a very nice photo. B (talk) 02:51, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BillLeavy.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:BillLeavy.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by RyguyMN ( [ notify] | contribs).

<hr style="width:50%;" /> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 21:42, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Horribly low quality screenshot from a Fox Sports broadcast being used in the infobox for the referee depicted therein B (talk) 23:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Since the subject is a living person, it is possible to make a free photo of him. —teb728 t c 04:55, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geraldaustin.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Geraldaustin.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by RyguyMN ( [ notify] | contribs).

<hr style="width:50%;" /> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 21:42, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Screenshot of a Fox Sports broadcast being used to depict the referees contained therein B (talk) 23:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Since the subject is a living person, it is possible to make a free photo of him. It might not be in his uniform, but it would be adequate to identify the subject of the article. —teb728 t c 04:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LarryNemmers.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:LarryNemmers.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by RyguyMN ( [ notify] | contribs).

<hr style="width:50%;" /> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 21:42, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Screenshot from an ABC sports broadcast being used to depict a referee B (talk) 23:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Since the subject is a living person, it is possible to make a free photo of him. It might not be in his uniform, but it would be adequate to identify the subject of the article. —teb728 t c 04:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RonBlum.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:RonBlum.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by RyguyMN ( [ notify] | contribs).

<hr style="width:50%;" /> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 21:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Screenshot of a Fox Sports broadcast being used to depict a referee B (talk) 23:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Since the subject is a living person, it is possible to make a free photo of him. It might not be in his uniform, but it would be adequate to identify the subject of the article. —teb728 t c 04:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jaynemansfield4.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: - Delete - nothing below or in the rationales on the image page show how this image passes the WP:NFCC requirements - Peripitus (Talk) 10:34, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Jaynemansfield4.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Philbertgray ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Jayne Mansfield uses 7 non-free images, 5 of which violate WP:NFCC. Insofar as the purpose of this image is to illustrate the Mansfield/Hargitay marriage, the marriage is described in text, and no image is needed to illustrate it. Insofar as the purpose is to illustrate History of the bikini, there are already plenty of free photos in that article. Insofar as the purpose is to identify Miklós Hargitay, surely there must be a free image of him somewhere (although I don’t specifically know of one). If this image must be kept to identify his article, can we get a decision here that it should be removed from Jayne Mansfield and History of the bikini? —teb728 t c 06:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * When Mansfield and her husband Miklós Hargitay toured for stage shows, she showed a fair amount of skin in the leopard-spot bikini she wore for her stage shows. Kathryn Wexler of The Miami Herald wrote, "In the beginning as we know it, there was Jayne Mansfield. Here she preens in leopard-print or striped bikinis, sucking in air to showcase her well noted physical assets." Her leopard-skin bikini remains one of the earlier specimens of the fashion.
 * Why and how such a well covered piece of art (if photography is considered as an art form) can be discounted as an historically insignificant material? Why and how the impact shall be assessed by the reader without the image? And, how did it boil down to - "Insofar as the purpose of this image is to illustrate the Mansfield/Hargitay marriage, the marriage is described in text, and no image is needed to illustrate it" - these antiques are big part of the subject's life and career. Aditya (talk • contribs) 11:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I am glad that you have now stated what the purpose of the image was supposed to be. “Illustrating the marriage” was my best guess based on the article, and the non-free use rationale gives no clue. But even with the clarification, that purpose (all but the word “Here”) could be achieved in plain text without any need for an image to illustrate it. Notice that it is understandable here without an illustration. —teb728 t c 21:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

<hr style="width:50%;" /> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 22:23, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment If no free image exists to use for identification of Miklós Hargitay, the first image here would be more suitable for identification than the subject of this FFD. —teb728 t c 06:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment - I've relisted this, hoping to get more consensus. At the end of this relist, the closing admin should not relist this again, as it has been on WP:FFD since the end of July. Killiondude (talk) 22:23, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zane Morris Wrestler Advertising Face Shoot ©2008.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Zane Morris Wrestler Advertising Face Shoot ©2008.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Hyperbeard ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. —  Σ  xplicit 22:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zanorath.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Zanorath.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Zanorath ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. —  Σ  xplicit 22:51, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.