Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 August 9



File:Daithioc.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Daithioc.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by AlanMc ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Claims to be scanned from an original photograph, but pretty obviously scanned from a magazine reproduction. No source given.  Durova 298 00:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deford airport small.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, poorly named, but in use and appropriate. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Deford airport small.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by DanRother ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Image is not what the description purports to be. There is no airport with this name. None of the links provided with the article support the existence of the airport. This appears to be a hoax. older ≠ wiser 01:42, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I recognize that building. It is Buffalo Niagara International Airport, not "Deford Airport".69.204.97.101 (talk) 20:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I too recognize the building and it is Buffalo Niagara International Airport. Why it was called that, however, confuses me. Con5021 (talk) 18:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kim Aki-Hishori.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Kim Aki-Hishori.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Ridht ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * No source given, and I doubt it was the uploader's work... — Ed   (Talk  •  Contribs)  02:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as hoax and copyvio. I can't find a copy of the same image on the web, but that is Japanese idol Aki Hoshino, and it was uploaded by an editor who is responsible for creating a number of hoax articles, including Kim Aki-Hishori and Ryan Torda (himself). --DAJF (talk) 12:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: User:Ridht has now been blocked for 1 month by User:Dante Alighieri for repeated vandalism and hoax article creation. --DAJF (talk) 15:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wop group 2008.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:14, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Wop group 2008.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Straightedge24 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * The image may and probably is a copyright violation. There is no permission of its use and is basely promotional for the band it illustrates. For this reason, it is replaceable by a fair use image. FireCrystal (talk) 04:09, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Teletoon1.PNG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Teletoon1.PNG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Musimax ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * This historic logo is not discussed, nor is it clear why it is needed. Does not appear to meet our non-free content criteria. J Milburn (talk) 10:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'll add captions explaining this logo, obviously the main issue here is still NFCC8, everybody here has different views on what is significant. I believe that non-free logos should be allowed as long as it's not excessive, well explained and preferable be in the article and not a separate section dedicated to logos.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Walk the Line phoenix.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Walk the Line phoenix.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by NWill ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * In the context of other images showing the central character, this doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 10:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Executioners Medley.ogg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Executioners Medley.ogg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by SlothJosh ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * A soundtrack medley does not increase understanding of a fighting game. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  15:29, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wan-Hoo_crater_-_by_Change_1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Wan-Hoo_crater_-_by_Change_1.jpg([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Alex Needham ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Was posted by on WP:SCV in error, reposting here, with Johnson's rationale: "No proof for the public domain claim". Reposting only, vote Neutral but leaning delete, the "kinda PD" comment seems dubious. MLauba(talk) 15:59, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Karl Auerbach.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:18, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Karl Auerbach.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Eperotao ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * useless page Eperotao (talk) 15:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Karl Auerbach.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted the other duplicate (name wasn't as good). –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Karl Auerbach.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Eperotao ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * duplicate Eperotao (talk) 15:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rabbi Aryeh Levin.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Rabbi Aryeh Levin.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Chesdovi ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Any picture of this guy before his 38s will be PD-Old. Some effort should be made to find one out there. No reason to use this replaceable non-free image (where not even the copyright holder is identified). Damiens .rf 18:20, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LCA Tejas with lightening pod.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:LCA Tejas with lightening pod.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by User:Johnxxx9 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Fails NFCC - free licensed photos of the HAL Tejas are available Nigel Ish (talk) 21:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AT&T Death Star Logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:AT&T Death Star Logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Jeff G. ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * This image is not in any way significant. It was created by an Encyclopedia Dramatica user, and is currently being used on the 4chan article to decorate a section on 4chan's blocking, and another article without a rationale. I fail to see what the image is adding. J Milburn (talk) 22:11, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - what matters is that AT&T's logo has been long compared to the Death Star, and this image, no matter who created it, helps to illustrate that comparison. I have fixed the rationales and restored the image to one article.    — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 22:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep "*Strong keep - what matters is that AT&T's logo has been long compared to the Death Star, and this image, no matter who created it, helps to illustrate that comparison. I have fixed the rationales and restored the image to one article.    — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 22:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)" This  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.154.212.17 (talk)  — 4.154.212.17 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Strong keep - Image is also in use on Death Star and the American Telephone & Telegraph article. The Death Star article in particular has a reference to this nickname/imagery being longstanding.  Also it could be interpreted that you are saying the image's connection to Encyclopedia Dramatica is an additional rational for deletion, which would seem rather uncalled for.  I personally fail to see what the image is detracting, and it would seem to add particular weight in the Death Star usage. --Human.v2.0 (talk) 22:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * delete. As a nonfree image, it could be replaced by simply putting the ATT logo next to the death star in an article. since its a combination of 2 copyrighted images combined into a third copyrighted image, its use would have to be compellingly important, say an article on a lawsuit over the image. i dont think the current articles that use it justify its use. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence this image has been subject of commentary or discussion, or in any way actually matters to anyone. Wikipedia is not a file server for storing images some guy cooked up in his spare time. Yes, the AT&T logo has been compared to the Death Star -- so, we should present a copy of the AT&T logo at the Death Star article, and maybe an image of the Death Star at the AT&T article. --EEMIV (talk) 04:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons articulated by EEMIV. --Cameron Scott (talk) 06:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Evil saltine (talk) 09:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: It isn't detracting anything and shows a good mix of AT&T and the Death Star. The article will only benefit from keeping it. – túrian  patois  15:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: Freedom loving people oppose censorship and censureship and promote and protect freedom of expression. WhipperSnapper (talk) 18:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * this has nothing to do with censorship. Freedom loving people support obeying copyright law, because we will be taken more seriously in obtaining more liberal copyright law by respecting the present ones.    DGG ( talk ) 19:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Delete the image since I find no reason for the image to be in the 4chan article and the "American Telephone and Telegraph" article. I mean, what purpose does the image have to be on the 4chan AT&T ban section and the AT&T Corp. Nicknames section. I have read those sections and the image has nothing to add to them. I find it pointless to be there. Jerrysmp (talk) 21:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Mercurywoodrose brings up a good point. A simple side-by-side comparison would work just fine. This would also be a more NPOV way to illustrate the similarities between the AT&T logo and the Death Star. In fact, I suggest we replace This image with a side-by-side illustration. Failing that, delete. Lovelac 7 03:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It makes no sense to use a non-free image to point out a passing similarity between two unrelated things. Who cares if a company logo bears a resembalance to a fictional ship? They are just circles. Then there is the whole copyright issue...  bahamut0013  <sup style="color:#000;margin-left:3px">words <sub style="color:#000;margin-left:-20px">deeds 15:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and EEMIV. Rettetast (talk) 18:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Image is useful in illustrating opposition to AT&T. Imagery is very old and well-illustrated by this image. 96.237.167.67 (talk) 01:52, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly decorative and not even referenced in the text. Use of this image fails WP:RS as ED clearly does not qualify.  In order for use of this image to appropriate, it would need to have been mentioned by some reliable source somewhere - just being used on 4chan and ED doesn't make the logo significant. --B (talk) 18:06, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spider555.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Spider555.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Soulshine25 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Uploaded for an article deleted per Articles for deletion/Ron Entwistle, no other encyclopedic purpose B (talk) 23:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.