Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 19



Map-Oguz Language World.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Map-Oguz Language World.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Oguzhan620 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * This is a wrong version of another wrong map (File:Turkic-oghuz.png), which shows Iraqi Kurdistan where an Indo-European language is spoken as a Turkic-speaking area. The map is obsolete and not in use Ellipi (talk) 16:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

Steve_marriot_and_first_wife_jenny.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Steve_marriot_and_first_wife_jenny.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Sue_Wallace ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Non-free image used without any commentary on the image itself. Not required for reader comprehension.  howcheng  {chat} 17:03, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Why should it be deleted? It's a good, vintage photo. God only knows Wikipedia needs all the photos of the 1960s it can find as there's a serious dearth of images from that time period. Therefore I strongly, emphatically OPPOSE deleting the image.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.