Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 October 27



File:Iaio musicvideo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Iaio musicvideo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Soulyaboy ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * This file fails to meet our WP:NFCC policy. Specifically, it does not meet point eight of the policy as the file does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. — ξ xplicit  16:03, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CrankItUpvideo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: - Delete - a significant in reader's understanding is required. This is a much greater requirement than simply showing something. - Peripitus (Talk) 03:06, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:CrankItUpvideo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Juanacho ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * This file fails to meet our WP:NFCC policy. Specifically, it does not meet point eight of the policy as the file does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. Seems to be used solely for decoration, not to increase the readers' understanding of the topic. — ξ xplicit  16:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * But like in several music articles have an image that supports the music video section, the screenshoot shows Tisdale in the music video and is just of the most important part of the music video. Also it shows her with different looks compared with the official artwork for the single. The first reason for nominating the article to be deleted was non-free use rationale, but I add the necessary information. I think it's OK now. Juanacho 16:24, 27 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I have to agree that the music video still has become a normal part of a single article, but still, they do violate WP:NFCC: there just isn't anything about the single that becomes substantially easier to understand because the image is there. There really needs to be a purge of these things. All they have done is double the non-free content load of the normal single article, and they already begin one step behind, because the use of the single cover image is already pretty difficult to justify.&mdash;Kww(talk) 03:04, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scott Baietti.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Scott Baietti.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Baiettis1 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Unused personal photo (user blanked his userpage where it was used). Sherool (talk) 20:07, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fdd.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Fdd.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Zelda011 ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Unused, seems related to a couple of deleted articles about a "hoax" at some school, Articles for deletion/Fridays The Day & Articles for deletion/The Day Signs. Sherool (talk) 20:49, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheNumber2ShowID3.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:TheNumber2ShowID3.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Ootoowak ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Not used since related article was deleted. Sherool (talk) 20:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cluesman untitled.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Cluesman untitled.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Lumpen ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Not used, assosiated article was speedy deleted multiple times and then "salted" back in 2006. Sherool (talk) 21:06, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blackpool F.C. 1969-70.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Blackpool F.C. 1969-70.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Dudesleeper ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 21:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1948 FA Cup Final BFC.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:1948 FA Cup Final BFC.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Dudesleeper ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 21:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.