Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 October 31



File:Peerless.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Peerless.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Infrogmation ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Fails WP:NFCC: replaceable by free image. The appearance of the label is different in the two images, but the article makes no mention of the design, so there's no real need for this non-free image Papa November (talk) 01:23, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cayetano-portrait.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Cayetano-portrait.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by fiskeharrison ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Photo was taken by Nicolas Haro, with whom I work, and since he gave me permission to use it on my blog, I thought it meant I had permission to use it in the way I have. He has pointed out that I do not, and he wants it withdrawn. Fiskeharrison (talk) 08:03, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Pendulum - Before the duel.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:The Pendulum - Before the duel.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by fiskeharrison ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * This photograph by Matt Jamie was commissioned by me as producer of the play The Pendulum and I thought I owned the rights to it. However, Matt never gave up his rights over the photograph, so anything I have ticked/signed to the contrary is irrelevant and he wants it withdrawn from here. Fiskeharrison (talk) 08:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Pendulum - Before the duel (small).JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:The Pendulum - Before the duel (small).JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by fiskeharrison ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * This is a low res of the photo above. As with that: *This photograph by Matt Jamie was commissioned by me as producer of the play The Pendulum and I thought I owned the rights to it. However, Matt never gave up his rights over the photograph, so anything I have ticked/signed to the contrary is irrelevant and he wants it withdrawn from here. Fiskeharrison (talk) 08:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pendulum-E-flier.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Pendulum-E-flier.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by fiskeharrison ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * This image is of a poster designed by Andy Cooke, using a photo by Matt Jamie, both commissioned by me as producer of The Pendulum. However, I have discovered that NEITHER gave up their electronic rights over the image and BOTH want it removed. Anything else I have ticked/signed to the contrary is irrelevant and this is a clear copyright violation.Fiskeharrison (talk) 08:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shakira photographed September 2009 cover of Rolling Stone.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Shakira photographed September 2009 cover of Rolling Stone.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Renné ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Non-free image of a living person, not needed to identify the individual as free alternatives exist. Additionally, this image is not being used to increase the readers' understanding. File fails both WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. — ξ xplicit  20:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not needed for the article. Nothing significant about the cover. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:17 DVD - Ricky Martin 17.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:17 DVD - Ricky Martin 17.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Renné ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * This file fails to meet our WP:NFCC policy. Specifically, it does not meet point three, section a as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. The DVD cover is not significantly different from the album cover to justify its use. — ξ xplicit  20:17, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Blatant delete the DVD cover and album cover are essentially identical. No need for two essentially identical images to convey the point. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Moon Lee Girls with guns.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Moon Lee Girls with guns.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) - uploaded by Youal ( [ notify] | contribs).


 * Replaceable non-free image. Was tagged as such, however I've declined the speedy, and brought it here for discussion. PhilKnight (talk) 22:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Because this is an article about a film genre, this illustrates the Girls with guns article in a way that a non-film, non-promotional photo could not. A simple photo of a girl with a gun would not be germane, where this photo is of one of the genre's leading ladies. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 07:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. The use of the image in the infobox Moon Lee is definitely a violation of WP:NFCC as she is a living person; I'm removed that rationale from the image description page and the image from that article. As for its use at Girls with guns, I fail to see how this picture, with a caption saying nothing but "Moon Lee" "would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding" as required by WP:NFCC. Note also that the image's tag says it is to be used "for critical commentary and discussion of the film and its contents", and it's being used in an article on the genre in general, not the specific film the photo is from (if this is in fact a screenshot from a film, which I doubt; it looks more like a promotional photo to me). +Angr 13:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It says clearly in the rationale that it is indeed a promotional photo. Nobody ever claimed otherwise. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 13:54, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoever put the non-free film screenshot tag on it implicitly did claim otherwise. That tag is (as its name implies) for film screenshots, not for promotional photos. +Angr 14:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Fail to see any point to this photo, especially a point that can't be replaced with a free image. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete A broad topic means broad opportunities for getting a free image. Gigs (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.