Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 August 2



File:Orlando Health Community Benefit.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Orlando Health Community Benefit.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mjschmidt715 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * orphaned file with no reasonable use Terrillja  talk  00:18, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DornierC-Legion.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. - F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 00:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * File:DornierC-Legion.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Dapi89 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * A non-free image that was tagged as being replaceable. We have at least one free image of vaguely similar aircraft, but I'm not sure that they're similar enough to be replaceable enough for this nonfree image.  Nominator states that the context of this plane being in the Spanish Civil War and carrying markings for the same makes it irreplaceable.  Overall, I'm not sure whether this is properly replaceable or not, so I'm bringing it here as a procedural nomination. Nyttend (talk) 00:39, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep the Condor Legion no longer exists, and the other image is not in Condor Legion livery, so cannot be used to illustrate Condor Legion activity, as it would be misleading and unhelpful to imply that the livery used would be Luftwaffe standard livery. 76.66.193.119 (talk) 03:54, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Image purpose is "to illustrate the article". A free Legion Condor is already in the article.  There are numerous other images of this type of aircraft (1, 2, 3, etc.)  That it's in-flight is not necessary to understand the article, nor are the insignias (they're plainly and freely depicted elsewhere in the article and, alternatively, could always be rendered - like this image to illustrate American Airlines Flight 96).  NFCC#1 is "could be created..."  Эlcobbola  talk 14:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment none of your German Do 17 images are good for the Condor Legion, as they are clearly Luftwaffe, making them misleading. The other one, does not feature clear Condor Legion markings, so I'm not sure how useful it is for illustrative purposes. Though File:Bf109C LegionCondor2.jpg does seem to fit the bill for a Conodor Legion fighter with clear markings. 76.66.193.119 (talk) 04:00, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, decorative rather than informative. Stifle (talk) 08:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Obvious Keep. Its ridiculous to delete the only picture of a CL Dornier. It most certainly is informative. What rot. Dapi89 (talk) 09:21, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: Dapi89 is image uploader. Эlcobbola  talk 18:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * None of the other photos properly shows an early series "Flying Pencil" Do 17, as used by the Condor Legion - the fair use argument would be stronger for the Dornier Do 17 article, where it has been removed (but we still have a fair use justification). Keep.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * That doesn't address the concerns. How would a reader's understanding be impaired by the omission of this image?  Free alternatives exist of this type of aircraft (sans legion markings) and of other aircraft with legion markings.  Are readers not sufficiently intelligent to imagine this aircraft with alternate markings?  How is such an image necessary to understand this article?  Эlcobbola  talk 18:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It isn't just the markings. The early series Do 17 is very different than the Do 17Z that we have free photos of. The aircraft have completley different noses. A picture of the Do 17Z is unsuitable to represent an early model Do 17 or a Condor Legion aircraft.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:56, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If the Condor could be rendered, why not the early series Do 17? Эlcobbola  talk 19:01, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Onfire.1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Onfire.1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Rencin24 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξ xplicit  03:53, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lancashire flag.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Lancashire flag.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by GrahamPadruig ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Although the dimensions are a few pixels off, this is essentially the same as commons:File:FlagOfLancashire.PNG taken from . I don't think it's necessary to keep a duplicate here. PC78 (talk) 23:55, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.