Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 August 30



File:Fredemo-vargasllosa.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Fredemo-vargasllosa.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Soman ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Poster is not being critically discussed in either article it's being used it, unclear why the image is essential to the understanding of the reader. Fails WP:NFCC. — ξ xplicit  18:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, poster of a political party used in article on that particular party. The image illustrates 1) logo of the party and 2) graphical discourse of the party, and greatly aids graphic identification of the article subject. --Soman (talk) 23:59, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not the logo of the party, it's one poster of the candidacy of one person. This does not represent the entire political group. It's not needed in Mario Vargas Llosa as the poster itself is not being critically discussed, nor is it needed in Democratic Front (Peru) as free text would suffice to inform the reader that Vargas Llosa ran for the presidency. — ξ xplicit  08:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * ? It is not an individual poster, but a poster for the presidential candidature (in fact, the sole presidential candidature of this particular party). It contains the logo, the colour scheme and graphical profile of the party. ~-Soman (talk) 09:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thirdndths.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Thirdndths.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Ricardiana ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Unclear why this second book cover is essential for the understanding of the article. This cover is not significantly different to justify its use. Fails WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. — ξ xplicit  19:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gardner at the Witches' Mill.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Gardner at the Witches' Mill.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Midnightblueowl ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Image is used to show "Gardner's work at the museum". I'm sure his work at the museum is of importance to the article, but that doesn't mean we need to decorate the section with a non-free image of him working at the museum. J Milburn (talk) 20:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I disagree; there are no free alternatives, and without this image, the article would visually appear very dull. Besides, as you noted, Gardner's work at the Museum played a huge part in his later life - surely it should therefore be included ? (Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC))
 * No. We don't use non-free content because articles look dull without it, and the fact that what it illustrates is important doesn't mean it needs to be illustrated. The image does not add significantly to reader understanding of the article. J Milburn (talk) 21:09, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Numberwang.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:00, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Numberwang.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by ISD ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Doesn't add to understanding of Numberwang or That Mitchell and Webb Look. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.