Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 June 21



File:180px-estatua de alfonso i de aragón1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * File:180px-estatua de alfonso i de aragón1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Salem Wolf ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * an image of Alfonso the Battler with "wife-beater shirt on" is of dubious value and unencyclopedic Constantine  ✍  06:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as I agree it has no use whatsoever. magnius (talk) 11:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * delete. A photoshopped version of file Estatua de Alfonso I de Aragón.jpg used to vandalize the article Alfonso the Battler. The uploader must be warned and watched. Bromador (talk) 14:41, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dr. Who Time of angels.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:11, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Dr. Who Time of angels.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Hobit ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * This image would appear to violate the Doctor Who WikiProject manual of style (ie. Non-free screenshots should not solely rely on a plot point to justify their use, eg. "This image portrays an important plot point." While the image may rely on the plot to justify its use, it must also rely on other sections of the article; for example, a key part of the production of the episode, or an aspect of the episode which is notable among television critics,). More disturbingly, it also seems to breach the more general WP:NFCC, especially Criterion 1 (it's just a picture of a statue of an angel, and while it does perhaps have some stylistic points distinguishing it from, say, the Angel Michael figure of which everyone knows, these points are minor—leading onto issues with Criterion 8) and Criterion 8 (the picture's omission would not be detrimental to readers' understanding of the episode, which is the page on which it is used—to understand the plot and significance of the episode, one does not need to see the monsters and to have a perfect visualisation of their appearance, and as I've anyway outlined, the non-free image is not the sole way of depicting the monsters anyway). I should also point out that the FUR states, Also, it seems pretty reasonable that an image illustrating a TV episode titled "The Time of Angels" should depict an Angel. This is clearly not a reason to include non-free content; the titles of episodes range from the literal to the metaphorical, naturally. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  stannary parliament  ─╢ 07:25, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, I have identified two free images of Weeping Angels released on Flickr under CC-BY, which, while not quite as arty, should be used as a replacement, as per the precedent established at Talk:Amy Pond (a fan-taken free image, while not as attractive as official promotional images, should nevertheless be used). ╟─ Treasury  Tag ►  condominium  ─╢ 07:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as it clearly doesn't fit various copyright guidelines. I didn't see a problem with the older image that was grabbed from TV tbh. magnius (talk) 11:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as uploader. The first image TT found looks perfect. (btw, aren't uploaders supposed to be notified about XfDs? Hobit (talk) 17:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Licensetokill.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Licensetokill.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by MachoCarioca ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * This image should not be used in Timothy Dalton, and appears to be only decorative in License to Kill, and should therefore be removed. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete as the FUR is to vague to indicate the image's intended use. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  quaestor  ─╢ 14:27, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sandystone.wiki.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Sandystone.wiki.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Ruchel47 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * No source, no author. Bromador (talk) 14:18, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Taged with di-no source as it should be :) ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  constabulary  ─╢ 14:26, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UrracaRegina TumboA2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * File:UrracaRegina TumboA2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Salem Wolf ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Photoshopped version of UrracaRegina TumboA.jpg, used to vandalize the page Urraca of León and Castile. This not a single joke of this user; all his contributions must be monitored. The user also removes warnings from his talk page, I guess, to hide his repeated abuse. Bromador (talk) 14:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Obvious delete - should probably have been tagged for speedy deletion under G3 or F1.  AJ Cham  18:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.