Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 October 22



File:Davy Kamanzi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Davy Kamanzi.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Davykamanzi ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * User has uploaded at least two other copyvio pictures under false free-use claims. This picture is highliy likely to be copyvio in any case. Fixer23 (talk) 08:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see it; uploader could easily have set his webcam or other cam to take image of himself and uploaded the result. I don't see a problem with this image since it wouldn't raise an eyebrow on Commons. Rodhull  andemu  00:25, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hervé davy sidney.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Hervé davy sidney.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Davykamanzi ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * User has uploaded at least two other copyvio pictures under false free-use claims. This picture is highliy likely to be copyvio in any case. Fixer23 (talk) 08:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Why? Unless you can find a previous upload attributed to someone else, why should we not assume good faith? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodhullandemu (talk • contribs)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * I'm aware of this. However, I'm listing their pictures in view of past clear copyright uploads by this user claimed under similar licenses. Not to mention their sockpuppet account which has also uploaded a couple of copyvio pictures as well. Fixer23 (talk) 10:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DOOMEDTOYOU.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * File:DOOMEDTOYOU.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Negabandit86 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * OR; no encyc use or value Skier Dude  ( talk  05:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 08:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DPA7.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * File:DPA7.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Howellboy ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * newspaper cover; sourced to "Gannett" - uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk  05:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luckyday.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Luckyday.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Negabandit86 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * OR; UE, no encyc use Skier Dude  ( talk  05:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-made, orphaned, unencyclopedic image. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 08:32, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC05854.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * File:DSC05854.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Norblits ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * OR, UE Skier Dude  ( talk  05:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Orhpaned. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 08:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DVDDIPI Unbox.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * File:DVDDIPI Unbox.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Contrakultura ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * film promotional material; unlikely uploader is cinematographer or studio or (c) holder Skier Dude  ( talk  06:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 08:34, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Afghan National Army emblem.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Afghan National Army emblem.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Fry1989 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Obselete image Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree it should be deleted, it has the same name of the new roundel on Commons, which interferes with using that one on English Wikipedia. Fry1989 (talk) 18:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MLC and Azteca.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * File:MLC and Azteca.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Unfadeable E.R.G. ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Original article it was meant for has been deleted; other image uploaded by this user requires permission, and it's likely this one does too, although I can't point to a website as proof. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:41, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arius portrait image for article.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Arius portrait image for article.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Sweetpoet ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * This image is unencyclopedic, orphaned, and low quality. It's copyright status is also disputed, as noted by the file's previous listing at PUF, though that is not the reason I am listing it here. The file is unencyclopedic because it is not actually a portrait of Arius as it purports to be. Per this discussion and this one and this one, this image is not of Arius, but of an unnamed deacon and appears to be a small part of a larger mosaic. That makes it unencyclopedic because it does not appear represent the whole work or even a particularly notable part of the whole work. The image's value to the encyclopedia is also diminished because the image has been modified to some extent. This file was a copy of a low-quality represnetation of a book cover that an editor modified to remove the title and other markings from image that would indicate it was something other than a photograph,. As such, the accuracy of the image is questionable, even to the limited extent it would represent that particular part of the mosaic. It appears the editor used a blurring technique or paint-over to cover over the title and other words and graphics on the cover. The file is orphaned, as it was moved off of the Arius article, though it was pasted on that article's talk where the removal was supported by consensus. It appears on no other articles or pages. The image is low quality because, as already noted, this was a low-quality book cover image file that was further modified. Novaseminary (talk) 21:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.