Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 October 26



File:Ryanhoward.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  06:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Ryanhoward.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Wikilagata ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * OR, possible CV - Unused image which looks like it's from a video game, likely of little encyclopedic use. Mosmof (talk) 04:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost certainly a screenshot (from this or something similar). Unused and no FU rationale, so why take the risk. QU TalkQu 21:02, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per QU. -- Extra   999  (Contact me  +  contribs) 05:28, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ElGuerrouj.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * File:ElGuerrouj.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Borat fan ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * WP:NFCC - press agency photo that's not critical to understanding the subject. Mosmof (talk) 05:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hindi-robot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Hindi-robot.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Mnhaqeel ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * This is an album cover, not a poster and a FUR is not appropriate as File:Tamil-endhiran.jpg is already used for the relevant article. Fæ (talk) 12:21, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Endhiran itunes.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * File:Endhiran itunes.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Senthilgceb ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * The image is being used in an article about the Enthiran soundtrack, not an article about iTunes. As such there is no appropriate case for free use of an application screen shot. Fæ (talk) 12:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bad fair use. QU TalkQu 21:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ThottadaBeach in Kannur- Kerala.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, No consensus or real reason to delete
 * File:ThottadaBeach in Kannur- Kerala.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Nazir ek ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * A low resolution image. Most probably taken from some website. Sreejith K (talk) 14:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. There's no evidence that I can see that it was taken from a website four years ago, and the low resolution nature of the picture means that the uploader's claim of "own work" is credible. No other image seems to be available to replace it. QU TalkQu 21:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Latvija Ventspils.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, No consensus or real reason to delete
 * File:Latvija Ventspils.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xil ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * lv:Attēls:Latvija Ventspils.png have deleted. Shizhao (talk) 15:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Why are you coming to me like some criminal four years later - the file was deleted as being duplicate, it dosen`t mean it sudenly isn`t GFDL or somehow invalid if the original was deleted. Suggest you tag it as redundant Xil  (talk) 10:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.