Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 February 14



File:Encentre-rendering1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Encentre-rendering1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Qyd ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).

This image is a copyrighted rendering of a future building, which now exists, and so images can now be acquired freely. 117Avenue (talk) 03:21, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nordic Countries.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Nordic Countries.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by User talk: ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).

Orphan 145.94.33.149 (talk) 03:43, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

This file is obsolete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.94.33.149 (talk) 03:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Why is it obsolete? 64.229.101.183 (talk) 05:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Move to commons license is compatible. 64.229.101.183 (talk) 05:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vrazki logo 1226971873.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Vrazki logo 1226971873.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by LoVeCa ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned (alleged) logo for a mall. The user claims to have created the logo himself, so it's either unencyclopedic or a copyvio. B (talk) 17:02, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FunnelDesignGroup.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * File:FunnelDesignGroup.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Funneldesign ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).

Uploaded for promotional article by now indef-blocked COI user. Unlikely to see legitimate use in the foreseeable future. - Vianello (Talk) 23:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CemBasman.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * File:CemBasman.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cem_Basman ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).

orphaned self-photo Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jūrmala beach.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete. The border, along with the relatively low resolution, trips my sixth sense on these kinds of things to make me think that this is not legit. If the uploader would be willing to submit an original, I will be happy to restore. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Jūrmala beach.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Leon187 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, i'm skeptical this is actually self-made based on the border. user's only contribution. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * We have no beach photos in Commons:Category:Jūrmala so we could use it there. Tineye gave no hits. Border - perhaps someone just likes to have a border around their photos? --MGA73 (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.