Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 January 2



File:JohnCBogle.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * File:JohnCBogle.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Oakshade ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Not at all clear what this image is adding to the article, not clear how it meets NFCC#8. J Milburn (talk) 01:36, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article John Bogle, the author of this work, describes this book as being written by Bogle and as a "best seller" and a "classic" (sourced). Showing the cover of this book is an excellent visual aid to the reader so they can see the book that the topic wrote and which became a best seller and is considered a "classic."--Oakshade (talk) 01:42, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm sure the book is important and worth discussing in the article. I've not challenged that. However, we do not use non-free content just because the article happens to discuss what it depicts. We use non-free content when it adds significantly to the article- how is this cover doing that? Is the cover in some way important? Is the reader unable to understand the article without the cover? J Milburn (talk) 02:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - this should have been a clear speedy, does not meet WP:NFCC, and has no rationale detailing why it should be used in this specific article. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep now that an article on the book has been created, but it should not be used in any other article. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ed, until we have an article about the book itself. Kelly  hi! 08:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * We do have an article on the book itself; Common Sense on Mutual Funds: New Imperatives for the Intelligent Investor.
 * In that case, use it on the book article, but remove it from the author article, where it's in violation of WP:NFCC. Kelly  hi! 09:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It is removed now, but I don't think it's correct to delete an image that's used properly in one article and possibly improperly in another. It's just a matter of removing the image from the article that may cause concern.--Oakshade (talk) 09:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Kelly  hi! 09:20, 2 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Update - Been meaning to do this a while, but the article on the book Common Sense on Mutual Funds: New Imperatives for the Intelligent Investor was just created. This image is the cover to that book.  The Rationale states very clearly: "The image is used as the primary means of visual identification of topics in the article." --Oakshade (talk) 09:04, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eric XIV of Sweden01.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Eric XIV of Sweden01.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by JoJan ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Orphaned LQ version of File:Erik XIV of Sweden by Steven van der Meulen 1561.jpg Kelly  hi! 01:47, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lowell School Alumni Graph.pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Lowell School Alumni Graph.pdf ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Kesasummers ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * OR; bad format - too small to be of any use Skier Dude  ( talk  03:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - The file appears to be 1,275 × 1,650 pixels in size. This doesn't seem small to me.--Rockfang (talk) 07:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nr38.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Nr38.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Peter Greenwell ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Orphan, unidentified subject, undoubtedly replaced. Kelly  hi! 06:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * move to commons license is compatible; it looks like a highway shield, but could conceivably be used for other things. 65.94.45.209 (talk) 06:36, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and delete it. I made it originally for the Gwydir Highway article, but someone made a SVG. No great loss if it goes. Peter Greenwell (talk) 06:39, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Also File:Nata2.png. Kelly  hi! 06:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wilber.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Wilber.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Ojw ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Orphan, obsoleted by File:GIMP Icon without brush.svg Kelly  hi! 06:52, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aflutter 4 to 1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Aflutter 4 to 1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Motremba ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Orphan, no description. Kelly  hi! 08:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chennai.adyar.boating.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Chennai.adyar.boating.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Brhaspati ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * "take whatever you want" does not equal "public domain" without something more specific. Kelly  hi! 08:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oldcapitolic.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Oldcapitolic.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Matt Yohe ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads).


 * Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly  hi! 23:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.