Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 June 5



File:Fire Department.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Fire Department.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Violeta123321 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fair use claim but doesn't really ad anything to the article. Eeekster (talk) 01:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Can you sort of elaborate a little? Your reason is hard to understand. Dusty777 (talk) 02:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Keep It is important to the article because Hopeful has hardly any buildings as an unincorporated town. The fire department, general store, baptist church, and a peanut company (all of which are pictured in the article) are the only buildings that the central part of the town has. It's use in the article is to better illustrate the town by showing all of the public buildings, of which there are very few. Upon searching no other non copyrighted images of this building exist. The copyright holder has contacted me through personal email and granted me use of this image for educational and informative use on Wikipedia. Further permission can be obtained if formally requested. This falls under # Wikipedia:NFCC#1 (No free equivalent exists) and # Wikipedia:NFCC#8 due to the fact that it is to better illustrate a community that has so few public buildings.Violeta123321 (talk) 04:20 5 June 2011 (UTC) —Preceding undated comment added 04:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete - a free image of this building could be taken - Peripitus (Talk) 05:09, 5 June 2011 (UTC)


 * By whom Peripitus? Although I have a great understanding of the area, I do not live in there nor do I know anyone who does. No free copy exists on the web. Violeta123321 —Preceding undated comment added 07:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC).
 * Struck second keep vote; You only get one.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  18:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you live near there? Do you pass through frequently? Do you know anyone who might? Perhaps you could contact them. You say you have the photographer's permission ... perhaps you could ask if he'd be willing to release the rights? Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Image of a generic building with a label on it. Does not add anything that words could not describe.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  18:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't even look like the stereotypical firehouse. 65.94.45.185 (talk) 04:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Aside from the merits of its inclusion in the article (a discussion we wouldn't be having if this were a free image), it's easily replaceable as in "someone, maybe not the uploader, but someone, can go there and shoot a picture of their own and upload under a free license." I have taken tons of pictures of small-town buildings like this in exactly that fashion. Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eighth Doctor and Grace kiss.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Eighth Doctor and Grace kiss.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Victory93 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

non-free image used to show two characters kissed. The image has no rationale that addresses how it significantly increases reader's understanding, and I cannot see what this image is beyond decorative. Image fails WP:NFCC - and is oversized to boot. Peripitus (Talk) 05:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hudson03.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Hudson03.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Geo Swan ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This is a low-res duplicate of File:Hudson03.jpg available on Commons. Nominated due to differing file formats. XLerate (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BornThisWaySpecialEdition.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:BornThisWaySpecialEdition.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by 68DANNY2 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC failing image, and consensus in the article linked is that no special edition cover is to be used — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 15:45, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pict0001.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Pict0001.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Cobby277 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, self portrait. Upload is user's only contribution.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  18:47, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Also fails WP:File names.  Rcsprinter  (talk)  19:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pict0003.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Pict0003.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Daimond ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Was used by someone without foreign language support to illustrate characters for an article. Has since outlived usefulness. Due to concerns about legibility over the second character, I don't think this has any further use.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  18:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pict0010.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Pict0010.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by GalaxyZero ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low quality fan art. No encyclopedic value. Orphaned.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  18:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Messboy.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Messboy.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Dd349304 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 19:02, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lady Gaga - You & I.ogg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: relisting on June 16 - because this something of an editorial decision, I think it should have at least another opinion or two agreeing with the deletion before we do it. --B (talk) 12:17, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Lady Gaga - You & I.ogg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by TehRandomPerson ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Sound clip is not discussed at all in the article on the song, no indication as to why this clip is important or representative of the song. It's just been thrown in there as fluff, which goes against the fair use criteria.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  22:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.