Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 May 7



File:Nicola Ogilvie from UK helping in Romanian orphange near Iasi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:13, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Nicola Ogilvie from UK helping in Romanian orphange near Iasi.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Duncanogi ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

unused family photo Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 08:49, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Already on the commons. — BQZip01 —  talk 20:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chengdu J-20 flying.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Chengdu J-20 flying.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Arius1996 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Claims to be user's own work, I think, but copies of it can be found all over the web - eg see this search http://www.tineye.com/search/9512090bdcf032819216260521c1eb231ee3df84/ -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note, uploader has now changed it to specify the author as "Chinese Internet", so it's clearly not suitably licensed -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Due to users history, I don't doubt that this is a copyright violation. Not as blatant as File:Mig 37B though. Current link does not appear to be the copyright owners. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Question. Do we have a similar image search tool? That would be very useful for cases like this. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * As an aside, I actually searched for the image using the source URL (as stated in the upload), but if I search using the Wikipedia URL I get several more hits - http://www.tineye.com/search/151308ac2802675232a50113712f1658bcf861e5/ (And I've just spotted they now have a right-click search extension for Firefox - I'm going to give that a try) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Unused copyvio=gone. — BQZip01 —  talk 17:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mig 37B.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Mig 37B.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Arius1996 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The image has got a copyright statement on it -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:16, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Uploader also claims it's licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0, but I see no evidence to support that -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per F9. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yep, you're right - deleted as F9 -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:39, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:'Laura', bronze sculpture by Emilio Greco, 1973, Hiroshima Museum of Art.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 00:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:'Laura', bronze sculpture by Emilio Greco, 1973, Hiroshima Museum of Art.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Wmpearl ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This non-free image is merely decorative. It is not used in an article about the sculpture, nor it actually discuss the features of the sculpture itself. Cambalachero (talk) 14:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * weak delete , see my comment on the case below. This image would easily be legitimate in the artist article if the text were expanded to contain at least a minimal amount of descriptive commentary about the artist's style, because such descriptions are typically in legitimate need of illustration, but in this case (unlike the one below) even that minimum of coverage is unfortunately currently missing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * changed per expansion of article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Also a weak delete I would support re-adding this image later if any context were given in an article (like was mentioned earlier). Otherwise, it needs to go. — BQZip01 —  talk 20:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep now — BQZip01 —  talk 08:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * keep I added information about the artist's style, including a direct reference to the image.Wmpearl (talk) 04:29, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:'Voyage', copper and brass sculpture by Michael Tom, 1985, East-West Center.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 00:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:'Voyage', copper and brass sculpture by Michael Tom, 1985, East-West Center.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Haa900 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This non-free image is merely decorative. It is not used in an article about the sculpture, nor it actually discuss the features of the sculpture itself. Cambalachero (talk) 14:55, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, an image of a representative work illustrating an artist's style is generally useful in articles about artists, and justifiable as long as there's at least a minimum of descriptive commentary about that art style in the text. In this case, the article is admittedly not much above that minium (the text is quite short and the description of the style and nature of his works could be a lot more specific), but I'd say it's just enough. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:19, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per FutPerf (don't think I've ever said that... :-) ) — BQZip01 —  talk 20:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep it illustrates the artist's styleWmpearl (talk) 04:34, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Homeless man, Tokyo, 2008.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: speedy close; file is on Commons. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Homeless man, Tokyo, 2008.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by MichaelMaggs ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No proof of permission from the clearly recognizable person depicted on the photo to publish it Formicula (talk) 19:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep
 * This is a file under commons, so this is the wrong forum
 * Commons:Commons:Photographs of identifiable people applies and permission is not needed as the subject is in plain sight in a public place. — BQZip01 —  talk 20:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ryanaircorkairport3.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Ryanaircorkairport3.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Kavs8 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Derivative work of copyrighted poster. Theleftorium (talk) 20:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Copyvio (admittedly it's probably just a mistake as many people don't fully understand copyright law) and not in use in an article, no FUR, etc. — BQZip01 —  talk 20:43, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.