Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 May 9



File:VideoSmarts-console.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:VideoSmarts-console.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Supremeadmiral ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Claimed to be self made but is a derivative image and would appear to be non free. Article uploaded for has been deleted Spartaz Humbug! 02:58, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Videosmarts-package.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F6 by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Videosmarts-package.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Supremeadmiral ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Claimed to be free use, is in reality non-free box/cover art. Does not exist on a page in the article space, and is of such low quality that should there ever be a mainspace article, it would be better served with an entirely new image.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  06:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Einstein at Complutense.pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep as apparently PD (anonymous publication in newspaper without visible photographer credit in the caption; became PD 70 years after publication; PD abroad before 1996, hence PD also in US). Notes: The non-free use claim is unconvincing, so if it wasn't PD it would clearly have been deleted. Same goes for the permission statement provided by the publisher. The argument that the watermark renders the image visually unusable hasn't found much support, and since the file is in fact currently used it's not compelling enough to force deletion; consensus for or against using it should be reached on the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Einstein at Complutense.pdf ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by PaulTheOctopus ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image is made unusable by the large watermark across the center. Unless it is PD (it was published in Madrid in 1923), it also fails WP:NFCC, not significantly increasing reader understanding of the article. (The 2009 copyright claim in small print at the bottom is bogus.) —teb728 t c 08:21, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Image is PD and is worth saving for the article despite the watermark. Hopefully a better image can be found. — BQZip01 —  talk 08:42, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Why is it PD? It would have to be because it was published 1923-1978 without compliance with US formalities, and in the public domain in Spain as of 1 January 1996; right? So Why was it PD is Spain? —teb728 t c 09:08, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Unless the photographer died right after snapping the photo, it probably is still copyrighted in Spain.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  09:21, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * One more thing. I don't read Spanish, but the bottom of the PDF says "Copyright (c) DIARIO ABC S.L, Madrid, 2009" followed by terms in Spanish.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  09:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the COM:Copyright link. By that the standard is life+80; so it would be in copyright even if the photographer died 7 years before taking it. If the photgrapher was anonymous, however, the standard is publication+70; so it would would have gone PD in 1994. (This kind of thing is why I tend to shy away from PD issues.) —teb728 t c 09:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1923 + 80 = 2003? If the author died seven years after the photo was taken it'd be PD now. Is the photographer listed though? Also does the copyright act differently since this was published as part of a magazine?  S ven M anguard   Wha?  18:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * If the photographer died in 1923, his works would have gone PD in Spain in 1924+80=2004; since that is not before 1996, it would go PD in the US in 1924+95=2019. “If the "intellectual property" of the work isn't owned by anybody, or it is a collective work where individual authors are not identifiable” (whatever that means), it would have gone PD in Spain in 1924+70=1994; since that is before 1996, it would also be PD in the US. (combining US criteria from BQZip’s cornell.edu link and Spanish criteria from Sven’s Commons link.) —teb728 t c 20:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I see no evidence he registered the work as copyrighted in the U.S. As he failed to comply with the required formalities, it's PD in the U.S. — BQZip01 —  talk 19:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Look again at the cornell.edu page you cited above: Works first published outside the US by foreign nationals or US citizens living abroad did not need to comply with US formalities. —teb728 t c 20:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, I looked again: 1923 through 1977+"Published without compliance with US formalities, and in the public domain in its source country as of 1 January 1996" (demonstrated below)=Public Domain. — BQZip01 —  talk 04:35, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: The image is clearly in PD by Spanish law. Please read art. 27.1 of Royal Decree 1/1996, April 12th (70 years after licit publication). http://civil.udg.es/normacivil/estatal/reals/Lpi.html#BM14 (PaulTheOctopus (talk) 21:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC))
 * Why is Article 26 (author’s lifetime+70 years) not applicable? And Commons:COM:Copyright says, “works of authors who died before December 7, 1987 are dealt with by the 1879 law, which sets a protection time of 80 years post mortem auctoris.” (Art. 6 is the applicable section there.) —teb728 t c 08:18, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Corporate authorship=70 years from date of publication per the Berne act. Even if you want to argue 80, the file photo is 88 yrs old. — BQZip01 —  talk 20:47, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep it. Art.27.1 because the author is anonymous. Besides, this photo is publicly available at the newspapers' website. Access is unrestricted and it is freely downloadable.(PaulTheOctopus (talk) 02:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC))
 * Why do you say it was anonymous? If it is anonymous, yes, Art 27.1 of the 1996 copyright law would be applicable, and it would be PD. But if it is not anonymous, Art 6 of the 1879 copyright law would be applicable, and it would not have been PD in Spain until after 1996 and thus not PD in the US until 2019. (BTW, the fact that the photo is publicly available at the newspapers’ website does not make if free to use. Most stuff you find on the web is not usable. And indeed this one has a (bogus) copyright claim; so the site does not intend it to be free.) —teb728 t c 10:50, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The photographer is not mentioned in the caption of the photo or in the publication. Perhaps ABC? Or the University? Or the Royal Academy of Sciences?(PaulTheOctopus (talk) 11:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC))
 * Watermark? Part of the nomination is based on the watermark, but almost all of the discussion has been on the copyright status. Does anyone want to discuss the watermark? I think the watermark across several people’s faces, including Einstein’s severely damages the usefulness of the photo. BQZip01 says it is worth saving for the article despite the watermark. Does anyone else have an opinion? —teb728 t c 10:50, 14 May 2011
 * If you keep the photo, someone will find a better quality version. If it is deleted, most likely no one will try to improve it. (PaulTheOctopus (talk) 11:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC))
 * Permission granted I have contacted ABC, the Spanish magazine that published in 1923 the photograph subject to this motion, requesting their approval for using the photo in Wikipedia. Today I have received their reply, granting their permission, under the condition that we identify the source (as we have done). Below is the exchange:

-Original Message- From: promociones@abc.es Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 5:28 AM Subject: RE: Fotografia

Buenos días, Puede incluirla, siempre que ponga el encale original del periódico y la fuente. Muchas gracias

-Mensaje original- Enviado el: sábado, 14 de mayo de 2011 14:07 Para: promociones@abc.es Asunto: Fotografia

Estimados Sres., Desearia recibir su permiso para colgar en Wikipedia la fotografia que aparecio en su portada del 9 de Marzo de 1923. http://hemeroteca.abc.es/nav/Navigate.exe/hemeroteca/madrid/abc/1923/03/09/001.html Atentamente

(PaulTheOctopus (talk) 01:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC))
 * This is looking promising but not quite there. It sounds like they are granting permission for use only on Wikipedia. Since Wikipedia has a goal of producing free content, acceptable permission must allow reuse by anyone for anything. See WP:COPYREQ for how to request and handle permission. —teb728 t c 10:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * All is good. They have granted permission for the image to be uploaded into Wikipedia in its current format. Therefore, the image has become free content (it already was PD, with or without the permission, in application of the law). (PaulTheOctopus (talk)) —Preceding undated comment added 14:34, 17 May 2011 (UTC).
 * You seem not to understand the concept of “free content.” See the definition of “Free Cultural Works”. Permission for use on Wikipedia in its current format is not a free license. A free license must allow reuse by anyone for anything, including a change of format. A work in the public domain is free, but if their permission has any relevance at all, it implies the photo is not free. —teb728 t c 21:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * "...if their permission has any relevance at all, it implies the photo is not free." This implication implies that they still hold the copyright. I contend they lost that copyright a long time ago. Organizations will often "grant permission" if only to continue said illusion; they are routinely shot down in court procedings. — BQZip01 —  talk 22:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Avatarmotioncapture.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:41, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Avatarmotioncapture.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by DrNegative ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free image being used to decorate the text discussing motion capture on Avatar. Nothing on this specific image seems crucial for the understanding of the text. Damiens .rf 02:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Peripitus (Talk) 09:59, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep – Illustrates a process by showing the "before" and "after" shots. Given that the article describes the process for creating a visual effect, an image showing the appearance of the effect is a legitimate accompaniment to the textual explanation for enhancing a reader's understanding, in keeping with the fair use rationale. Betty Logan (talk) 11:26, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I very much disagree with the assessment that the image showing Zoe Saldana as herself and as Neytiri, side by side, is not crucial for understanding the text. It is specifically showing what she looks like before and after the visuals effects. After information about the camera's abilities, the caption states, "The left image shows the blue cat-like alien Neyitiri shouting. The right image shows the actress who portrays her, Zoe Saldana, with motion-capture dots across her face and a small camera in front of her eyes." Further, the image does not have to be "crucial" to the reader's understanding. It should "significantly enhance" the reader's understanding. This image does. It was not there to simply decorate the text. It was showing the difference between a face with and without the special effects mentioned. Flyer22 (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep As discussed previously, the standard by which this image was nominated it the user's personal preferences, not policy. The image does not have to be "crucial to the reader's understanding", but it should "significantly enhance" the reader's understanding. It fulfills this role and should be kept. — BQZip01 —  talk 04:37, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment This images shows the before and after very clearly and would aid the reader's understanding significantly if there were text discussing this specifically (the second paragraph in that section is a bit vague). If reliably sourced content were added, I would support keeping this. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barnstar-tee.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Barnstar-tee.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

no evidence of permission. Damiens .rf 14:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Generic white tee shirt is uncopyrightable. Generic red text and red box is uncopyrightable. Barnstar image is free use.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  18:26, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Are pictures of white t-shirts uncopyrightable? --Damiens .rf 18:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I saw that all the elements of the photograph were free and completely forgot about the photograph itself. Whoops.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  07:23, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of permission - for the tee. Off2riorob (talk) 13:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I said that I created the file. I created it all -- every part of it and the whole together. Hell, I physically possess the actual metal barnstar itself and if you are in town, I will show it to you. I may even be persuaded to let you touch it. I won't let you wear the teeshirt but you can look at it.
 * How many ways can that be put so as to satisfy the deletionists? Must I repeat what I say over and over, image by image, dozens at one time? I made it; all of it. I licensed it appropriately at the time I uploaded it. Now go ahead and do as you please. &mdash; Xiong &#29066; talk *  07:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It seems be the same image as at www.cafepress.com/xuefang.27669753. That page says “All Content Copyright © 1999-2010 CafePress.com … All rights reserved.” What is your relationship to that page? See WP:IOWN. —teb728 t c 08:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pentasil Unit.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Pentasil Unit.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by OskeeWoWoW ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused low-resolution diagram with embedded caption text, replaced by higher-resolution text-less commons:File:Pentasil.png DMacks (talk) 16:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:M-Xylene to p-Xylene.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:M-Xylene to p-Xylene.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by OskeeWoWoW ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused low-resolution replaced by higher-resolution (WP:CHEMMOS) commons:File:M-Xylene to p-Xylene.png DMacks (talk) 17:02, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barnstar-bear.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Barnstar-bear.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Copyvio from cafepress.com/xuefang.27670717. Ted Bear picture from Cafe Press. Damiens .rf 21:08, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DB-xl-users-02a.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:DB-xl-users-02a.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Pseudo license. Unused screenshot of copyrighted software. Damiens .rf 21:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DB-xl-users-02b.png

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:DB-xl-users-02b.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Pseudo license. Unused screenshot of copyrighted software. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DB-xl-users-01.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:DB-xl-users-01.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Pseudo license. Unused screenshot of copyrighted software. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DB-users-sort-01.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:DB-users-sort-01.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Pseudo license. Unused screenshot of copyrighted software. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DB-users-list-01.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:DB-users-list-01.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Pseudo license. Unused screenshot of copyrighted software. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CT-ICN-001.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:CT-ICN-001.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Comoposite work where the source for the parts are not given. I believe it includes the logo of Photoshop, who knows. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:14, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DB-articles-list-01.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:DB-articles-list-01.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Pseudo license. Unused screenshot of copyrighted software. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CT-SPS-001.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:CT-SPS-001.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free screenshot of copyrighted software, wrongly tagged as free, used outside of main space. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CT-WEX-0050.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:CT-WEX-0050.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free screenshot of copyrighted software, wrongly tagged as free, used outside of main space. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CT-SFH-002.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:CT-SFH-002.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free screenshot of copyrighted software, wrongly tagged as free, used outside of main space. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CT-SFH-001.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:CT-SFH-001.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free screenshot of copyrighted software, wrongly tagged as free, used outside of main space. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CT-SFH-005.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:CT-SFH-005.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free screenshot of copyrighted software, wrongly tagged as free, used outside of main space. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CT-SFH-004.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:CT-SFH-004.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free screenshot of copyrighted software, wrongly tagged as free, used outside of main space. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:25, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A-Batt BQ Bowl Champions 2000-2001.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 12:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:A-Batt BQ Bowl Champions 2000-2001.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by BQZip01 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Not used, not useful. Wikipedia is not a webhost. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:29, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep
 * It most certainly IS used and has been used for at least two years
 * It is useful to me on my user page. That page contains images I find amusing/helpful and are permitted under User pages: "A small and proportionate amount of suitable unrelated material...A number of users have Wikipedia and sister project content such as (free use) pictures from Wikimedia Commons, favorite Wikipedia articles, or quotations that they like."
 * This is one of two images I've used in my user space that aren't used elsewhere. It isn't unreasonable to allow it under our Image use policy. In fact, Image_use_policy, it explicitly mentions this scenario:
 * "Images with you, friends or family prominently featured in a way that distracts from the image topic are not recommended for the main namespace; User pages are OK. "
 * In short, you have stated something demonstrably false and you've provided no valid rationale warranting deletion. — BQZip01 —  talk 04:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per BQZip01.--Milowent • <sup style="position:relative">talk<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">blp-r 13:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't understand why this was listed for deletion. →Wordbuilder (talk) 03:53, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * According to the nominator it was "a demonstration of stalking". It looks to me like general disruption for no good reason. I haven't seen any rebuttal that my points are off. — BQZip01 —  talk 05:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * That's weird. Next question: "Do you mind if I hit you in order to demonstrate assault?" →Wordbuilder (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do mind that, but anyone can look through my contributions any time they wish. — BQZip01 —  talk 14:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * When I asked you, you said you have no problem with me looking into your uploads. Now you call it stalking disruption . I hope you're just being funny. --<span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf  15:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought "stalking" was the word you used, Damiens.rf →Wordbuilder (talk) 20:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I meant disruption above. --<span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 20:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You asked for permission to "scrutinize [my] image uploads in a demonstration of stalking". You mentioned nothing about frivolous nominations for deletion or wasting my time playing 20 questions. — BQZip01 —  talk 02:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I though User:BQZip01/Images was just a page where you dumped your uploads. What use is that page, anyways? --<span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 20:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Did you even bother to ask? Did you even bother to read what I wrote above? (see point #2). You tell me to chill out, yet you file a frivolous deletion request and refuse to participate in any discussion. Since you've given no counterpoint, offered no explanation to your false assertions, and not closed the discussion, I see no alternative to this being a disruptive nomination. — BQZip01 —  talk 22:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I just asked that: What use is that page anyways? --<span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 22:37, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * For the last time, read #2 above. You DIDN'T bother to ask BEFORE nominating. — BQZip01 —  talk 22:53, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, let's do it at you pace: "2. It is useful to me on my user page. That page contains images I find amusing/helpful and are permitted under Wikipedia:User pages."
 * There are plenty of free web-hosts where you can upload images you "find amusing". Helpful (for this project) is something this image is surely not. --<span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 00:29, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Completely a red herring, but I'll address it anyway just to show how ridiculous your argument is. You are right. There are other websites out there where I can upload it. In fact, I could even create my own web site for relatively cheap (or even free!). I could put anything I wanted on it...however, that isn't the point here. The point is that WP policy permits such images on these pages and you have yet to show me where my quotes/understanding of policy/guidelines are in error. The only thing I can grasp is that you don't like it...which isn't a valid reason to delete something. So, until you have a valid reason for deletion (and perhaps you might want to strike and/or rephrase your "argument" for deletion since it isn't true AND isn't a valid reason for deleting something) or you get guidelines/policy to change through consensus, good day! — BQZip01 —  talk 04:46, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Use is permitted by WP:UPYES. —teb728 t c 11:22, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CT-SFH-003.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:CT-SFH-003.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Xiong ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free screenshot of copyrighted software, wrongly tagged as free, used outside of main space. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 21:29, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Find temperature.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Find temperature.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Venny85 ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

An unused "math" file that ought to be displayed using code. Wizard191 (talk) 22:08, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Veleshko zname.png
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color:#f3f9ff; margin:1em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #aaa;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * File:Veleshko zname.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | links | [ logs]) – uploaded by Vlatkoto ( [ notify] | contribs | uploads | upload log).

See Commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:MMCA(Kumanovo).png Sreejith K (talk) 06:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.